8.4 sec in total
531 ms
7.3 sec
542 ms
Visit beautyexpress.in now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Express content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautyexpress.in
Get styled by Indore's one of the best Unisex Salon Beauty Express providing a complete range of style statements. Visit the Parlour now!
Visit beautyexpress.inWe analyzed Beautyexpress.in page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
beautyexpress.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.657
8/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
531 ms
553 ms
527 ms
535 ms
18 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Beautyexpress.in, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautyexpress.in.
Page size can be reduced by 132.4 kB (5%)
2.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Beautyexpress.in main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.8 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Express images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyexpress.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (49%)
61
31
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Express. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautyexpress.in
531 ms
www.beautyexpress.in
553 ms
style.css
527 ms
responsive.css
535 ms
email-decode.min.js
18 ms
sdk.js
28 ms
font-awesome.min.css
35 ms
js
68 ms
jquery-3.2.1.min.js
548 ms
popper.min.js
519 ms
bootstrap.min.js
526 ms
jquery.sticky.js
543 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1130 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
1149 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1038 ms
wow.min.js
1028 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
1036 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1064 ms
custom.js
1556 ms
WhatsApp%20Image%202024-02-06%20at%2023.08.08.jpeg
2034 ms
logo.png
1558 ms
1.jpeg
2592 ms
2.jpeg
1869 ms
3.png
2623 ms
4.jpeg
2588 ms
5.jpeg
2824 ms
icon01.png
2374 ms
icon02.png
2297 ms
icon03.png
2812 ms
service01.png
3349 ms
service02.png
3328 ms
service03.png
3355 ms
service04.png
3359 ms
portfolio01.png
3341 ms
portfolio02.png
3339 ms
portfolio03.png
3842 ms
portfolio04.png
3858 ms
counter-icon01.png
3861 ms
counter-icon02.png
3867 ms
counter-icon03.png
3616 ms
counter-icon04.png
3854 ms
css
28 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
3613 ms
elegant-icons.min.css
3820 ms
bootstrap.min.css
3597 ms
meanmenu.min.css
3827 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
3848 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
3850 ms
animate.css
4092 ms
magnific-popup.css
3600 ms
typograhpy.css
3820 ms
default.css
3814 ms
widget.css
3812 ms
section-icon.png
513 ms
counter-bg.jpg
769 ms
testimonial-bg.jpg
765 ms
appoinmentbg.jpg
1260 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
168 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
168 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
233 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
241 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
256 ms
If2cXTr6YS-zF4S-kcSWSVi_sxjsohD9F50Ruu7B1i03Sup5.ttf
256 ms
If2cXTr6YS-zF4S-kcSWSVi_sxjsohD9F50Ruu7BMSo3Sup5.ttf
256 ms
ElegantIcons746c.woff
762 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
497 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
974 ms
sdk.js
154 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
164 ms
js
101 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
67 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
26 ms
beautyexpress.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
beautyexpress.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
beautyexpress.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyexpress.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautyexpress.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautyexpress.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Express. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: