3.3 sec in total
589 ms
2.4 sec
275 ms
Welcome to beautyflapper.com homepage info - get ready to check BEAUTYFLAPPER best content right away, or after learning these important things about beautyflapper.com
Forsale Lander
Visit beautyflapper.comWe analyzed Beautyflapper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 589 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
beautyflapper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.2 s
43/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
589 ms
249 ms
167 ms
414 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Beautyflapper.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Beautyflapper.disqus.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) belongs to the original domain Beautyflapper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 269.9 kB (33%)
821.4 kB
551.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautyflapper.com main page is 821.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 459.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. BEAUTYFLAPPER images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 147.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 92.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyflapper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (55%)
31
14
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BEAUTYFLAPPER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.beautyflapper.com
589 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
249 ms
formalize.css
167 ms
style.css
414 ms
style.css
179 ms
rwq4qep.js
156 ms
jquery.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
224 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
jquery.formalize.min.js
112 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
218 ms
jquery.watermark.min.js
171 ms
form.js
189 ms
core.min.js
195 ms
datepicker.min.js
388 ms
script.js
289 ms
disqus_comment_count.js
289 ms
ga.js
10 ms
__utm.gif
108 ms
bf-logo.png
125 ms
category-divider.png
121 ms
background.jpg
759 ms
transparency-1x1.png
122 ms
signup-container.jpg
130 ms
video-overlay.png
132 ms
scar-removal-cream-mask-280x160.jpg
292 ms
2.thumbnail.jpg
290 ms
icon-replies.jpg
211 ms
signuptrade-container.jpg
216 ms
sprite-footericons.png
193 ms
count.js
51 ms
typekit.css
254 ms
9773.js
36 ms
count-data.js
74 ms
beautyflapper.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
beautyflapper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
beautyflapper.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyflapper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautyflapper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautyflapper.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BEAUTYFLAPPER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: