Tools & Wizards About Us
beautymag.top screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

beautymag.top

Beauty Mag - Fashion, Luxury, Beauty, People and Celebrities

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

298 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

278 ms

beautymag.top screenshot

About Website

Visit beautymag.top now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Mag content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautymag.top

TWICE Tickets to Their Ready to Be Tour Are Selling Out-Here's How to See Their Biggest Tour Yet Before It's Too Late. Olivia Wilde Reveals 'French-Girl' Curtain Bangs on Instagram. MAC Upgraded & Ext...

Visit beautymag.top

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautymag.top page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautymag.top performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

53/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautymag.top

298 ms

app-jqm.b2153df1416b4abb9c47b1713b890c5d.css

83 ms

adsbygoogle.js

34 ms

app-jqm.5edbe27067bf6dcbaf30.js

139 ms

zrt_lookup.html

258 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Beautymag.top, 17% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (492 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

223.8 kB

After Optimization

183.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautymag.top main page is 223.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 108.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 27.2 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 40.8 kB
  • After minification 30.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beauty Mag needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 365 B

  • Original 108.0 kB
  • After minification 108.0 kB
  • After compression 107.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 46.2 kB
  • After minification 46.2 kB
  • After compression 37.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautymag.top needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (38%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Mag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautymag.top

beautymag.top

298 ms

app-jqm.b2153df1416b4abb9c47b1713b890c5d.css

app-jqm.b2153df1416b4abb9c47b1713b890c5d.css

83 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

34 ms

app-jqm.5edbe27067bf6dcbaf30.js

app-jqm.5edbe27067bf6dcbaf30.js

139 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

258 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

351 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

243 ms

google-play-badge-en.625fd95a.png

google-play-badge-en.625fd95a.png

208 ms

iLead-logo.26d41ee1.png

iLead-logo.26d41ee1.png

207 ms

ga.js

ga.js

142 ms

ajax-loader.8fd7e719.gif

ajax-loader.8fd7e719.gif

93 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

246 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

45 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

82 ms

ads

ads

213 ms

ads

ads

492 ms

ads

ads

388 ms

settings

settings

78 ms

button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js

button.d2f864f87f544dc0c11d7d712a191c1f.js

31 ms

embeds

embeds

26 ms

follow_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html

follow_button.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.en.html

49 ms

5111

5111

328 ms

downsize_200k_v1

downsize_200k_v1

114 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

117 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

115 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

112 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

112 ms

rx_lidar.js

rx_lidar.js

131 ms

042791247ab671b2831aa311d6583330.js

042791247ab671b2831aa311d6583330.js

124 ms

icon.png

icon.png

41 ms

s

s

19 ms

300x250-1.png

300x250-1.png

76 ms

css

css

60 ms

activeview

activeview

17 ms

sodar

sodar

31 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpy8.woff

36 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpy8.woff

45 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

20 ms

runner.html

runner.html

13 ms

aframe

aframe

22 ms

b4aq_x9zMiku-4ayY0gQrcEuJNMSghrM2Nuaea2nyAg.js

b4aq_x9zMiku-4ayY0gQrcEuJNMSghrM2Nuaea2nyAg.js

8 ms

Accessibility Review

beautymag.top accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

beautymag.top best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

beautymag.top SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautymag.top can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautymag.top main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautymag.top

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Mag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: