Tools & Wizards About Us
beautypackaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

beautypackaging.com

Beauty Packaging

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

beautypackaging.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beautypackaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Packaging content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautypackaging.com

Covering all types of packaging, Beauty Packaging is published for executives involved in the personal care, cosmetic and fragrance industry.

Visit beautypackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautypackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautypackaging.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.622

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.beautypackaging.com

2831 ms

8422329.js

54 ms

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

generatedCSS_98.css

185 ms

jquery.min.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Beautypackaging.com, 59% (54 requests) were made to Images.rodpub.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Html.rodpub.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautypackaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 452.7 kB (13%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautypackaging.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 240.3 kB

  • Original 278.2 kB
  • After minification 192.9 kB
  • After compression 37.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 85.2 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 240.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 193.0 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 400.9 kB
  • After minification 400.9 kB
  • After compression 384.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 51.3 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 48.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautypackaging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (14%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

72

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.beautypackaging.com

www.beautypackaging.com

2831 ms

8422329.js

8422329.js

54 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

generatedCSS_98.css

generatedCSS_98.css

185 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

35 ms

generatedJS_98.js

generatedJS_98.js

253 ms

buttons.js

buttons.js

29 ms

global_print.css

global_print.css

8 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

36 ms

banner.js

banner.js

68 ms

8422329.js

8422329.js

108 ms

js

js

142 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

140 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

138 ms

383_thumb.jpg

383_thumb.jpg

140 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

51 ms

523_thumb.jpg

523_thumb.jpg

261 ms

551_thumb.jpg

551_thumb.jpg

321 ms

205_thumb.jpg

205_thumb.jpg

547 ms

432_thumb.jpg

432_thumb.jpg

341 ms

453_thumb.jpg

453_thumb.jpg

321 ms

443_thumb.jpg

443_thumb.jpg

340 ms

424_thumb.jpg

424_thumb.jpg

339 ms

459_thumb.jpg

459_thumb.jpg

338 ms

411_thumb.jpg

411_thumb.jpg

340 ms

106_thumb.jpg

106_thumb.jpg

361 ms

755_thumb.jpg

755_thumb.jpg

359 ms

906_thumb.jpg

906_thumb.jpg

356 ms

842_thumb.jpg

842_thumb.jpg

357 ms

779_thumb.jpg

779_thumb.jpg

361 ms

748_thumb.jpg

748_thumb.jpg

366 ms

066_thumb.jpg

066_thumb.jpg

362 ms

94_thumb.jpg

94_thumb.jpg

588 ms

99_thumb.jpg

99_thumb.jpg

370 ms

66_thumb.jpg

66_thumb.jpg

542 ms

97_thumb.jpg

97_thumb.jpg

565 ms

93_thumb.jpg

93_thumb.jpg

564 ms

464_thumb.jpg

464_thumb.jpg

463 ms

462_thumb.jpg

462_thumb.jpg

581 ms

468_thumb.jpg

468_thumb.jpg

759 ms

442_thumb.jpg

442_thumb.jpg

564 ms

050_thumb.jpg

050_thumb.jpg

566 ms

569_thumb.jpg

569_thumb.jpg

565 ms

392_thumb.jpg

392_thumb.jpg

583 ms

682_thumb.jpg

682_thumb.jpg

583 ms

788_thumb.jpg

788_thumb.jpg

583 ms

459_main.jpg

459_main.jpg

805 ms

411_main.jpg

411_main.jpg

770 ms

309_main.jpg

309_main.jpg

592 ms

227_main.jpg

227_main.jpg

591 ms

218_main.jpg

218_main.jpg

756 ms

ads.js

ads.js

13 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

311 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

344 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

310 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

340 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

280 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

308 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

309 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

430 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

372 ms

desktop_logo.png

desktop_logo.png

279 ms

iMAWebCookie.js

iMAWebCookie.js

301 ms

facebox_loading.gif

facebox_loading.gif

67 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

67 ms

bg_black_transparent.png

bg_black_transparent.png

181 ms

212_main.jpg

212_main.jpg

433 ms

124_main.jpg

124_main.jpg

351 ms

106_main.jpg

106_main.jpg

394 ms

923_main.jpg

923_main.jpg

469 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

54 ms

css

css

51 ms

875_main.jpg

875_main.jpg

522 ms

523_main.jpg

523_main.jpg

614 ms

392_main.jpg

392_main.jpg

636 ms

322_thumb.jpg

322_thumb.jpg

447 ms

309_thumb.jpg

309_thumb.jpg

458 ms

304_thumb.jpg

304_thumb.jpg

623 ms

257_thumb.jpg

257_thumb.jpg

452 ms

227_thumb.jpg

227_thumb.jpg

463 ms

218_thumb.jpg

218_thumb.jpg

463 ms

212_thumb.jpg

212_thumb.jpg

472 ms

200_thumb.jpg

200_thumb.jpg

469 ms

124_thumb.jpg

124_thumb.jpg

477 ms

247_thumb.jpg

247_thumb.jpg

657 ms

16_thumb.jpg

16_thumb.jpg

389 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

77 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

108 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

117 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

28 ms

index.js

index.js

12 ms

Accessibility Review

beautypackaging.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

beautypackaging.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

beautypackaging.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautypackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Beautypackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautypackaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Packaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: