17.1 sec in total
3.8 sec
13.1 sec
179 ms
Click here to check amazing Beautyprint content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautyprint.de
Der Werbemittel- und Plakatshop für die Schönheits und Gesundheitsbranche. Plakate, Flyer, Geschenkgutscheine, Karten, kostenlose Fotos u.v.m.
Visit beautyprint.deWe analyzed Beautyprint.de page load time and found that the first response time was 3.8 sec and then it took 13.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
beautyprint.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.7 s
0/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value21.0 s
0/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value28.6 s
0/100
10%
3789 ms
176 ms
288 ms
400 ms
344 ms
Our browser made a total of 143 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (111 requests) were addressed to the original Beautyprint.de, 17% (25 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautyprint.de.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (69%)
3.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Beautyprint.de main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautyprint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 805.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautyprint.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 805.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 101 (96%)
105
4
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautyprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautyprint.de
3789 ms
hu-banner.min.js
176 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
288 ms
styles.css
400 ms
somdn-style.css
344 ms
frontend.css
363 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
449 ms
woocommerce.css
709 ms
init.css
497 ms
font-awesome.min.css
630 ms
ionicons.min.css
726 ms
vossen-icons.css
548 ms
style.css
587 ms
style.css
638 ms
style.css
1171 ms
main.css
848 ms
featherlight.min.css
769 ms
init.css
889 ms
style.css
838 ms
style_1.css
914 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
937 ms
frontend.min.css
1295 ms
swiper.min.css
1034 ms
post-4679.css
1051 ms
all.min.css
1153 ms
v4-shims.min.css
1099 ms
post-320.css
1178 ms
layout-styles.css
1240 ms
front.css
1248 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1389 ms
regular.min.css
1284 ms
jquery.min.js
1476 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1416 ms
frontend.min.js
1398 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1421 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1421 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1521 ms
css
22 ms
css
27 ms
css
27 ms
api.js
36 ms
wc-blocks.css
1444 ms
mailpoet-public.6d11f60f.css
1320 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1222 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1655 ms
frontendscript.js
1217 ms
featherlight.min.js
1209 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1202 ms
front.min.js
1164 ms
index.js
1170 ms
index.js
1128 ms
somdn_script.js
1173 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
1154 ms
order-attribution.min.js
1114 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1180 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1115 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1346 ms
react.min.js
1090 ms
hooks.min.js
1081 ms
deprecated.min.js
1155 ms
dom.min.js
1061 ms
react-dom.min.js
1140 ms
escape-html.min.js
1038 ms
element.min.js
1030 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
1053 ms
i18n.min.js
1052 ms
keycodes.min.js
1082 ms
priority-queue.min.js
1112 ms
compose.min.js
1100 ms
private-apis.min.js
1070 ms
redux-routine.min.js
980 ms
data.min.js
1020 ms
lodash.min.js
1181 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
1091 ms
url.min.js
1112 ms
api-fetch.min.js
1043 ms
wc-settings.js
987 ms
data-controls.min.js
996 ms
html-entities.min.js
1080 ms
notices.min.js
1044 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
1043 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
1146 ms
dom-ready.min.js
987 ms
a11y.min.js
1013 ms
primitives.min.js
1047 ms
warning.min.js
1019 ms
blocks-components.js
1118 ms
blocks-checkout.js
1186 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
1000 ms
init.js
1397 ms
wundermag_scripts_customized.js
1009 ms
mobile_menu.js
938 ms
widgets_accordion.js
987 ms
init.js
1328 ms
public.js
1055 ms
front-end.js
1040 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_k-UXtHA_A.ttf
54 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_iiUXtHA_A.ttf
65 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_gGUXtHA_A.ttf
66 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_naUXtHA_A.ttf
67 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_pqTXtHA_A.ttf
66 ms
nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf
66 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
66 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf
67 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtY.ttf
89 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDXbtY.ttf
89 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDXbtY.ttf
89 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
90 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
89 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf
90 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf
93 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf
93 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
93 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
92 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf
92 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
93 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
95 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
94 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
95 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
108 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
973 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1116 ms
waypoints.min.js
1076 ms
core.min.js
1107 ms
frontend.min.js
1090 ms
regular.ttf
1382 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1294 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1128 ms
icomoon.ttf
1119 ms
wonder700.ttf
1266 ms
wonder900.woff
1194 ms
wonder500.ttf
1255 ms
wonder400.ttf
1155 ms
wonder300.ttf
1319 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1363 ms
ionicons.ttf
1591 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1306 ms
Beautyprint_Logo.png
1240 ms
eBook-Titel-1-283x400.jpg
1501 ms
recaptcha__en.js
83 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
221 ms
beautyprint.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
beautyprint.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
beautyprint.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyprint.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautyprint.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautyprint.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beautyprint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: