1.1 sec in total
77 ms
950 ms
93 ms
Visit beautyshock.co now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Shock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautyshock.co
Beauty Shock Salon is Birmingham's newest vibrant beauty lounge. Call 205-224-5584 for booking and appointments
Visit beautyshock.coWe analyzed Beautyshock.co page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
beautyshock.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
77 ms
71 ms
79 ms
76 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautyshock.co, 35% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (588 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 212.6 kB (35%)
603.2 kB
390.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautyshock.co main page is 603.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 288.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 209.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 460 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Shock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)
28
17
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Shock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.beautyshock.co
77 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
71 ms
minified.js
79 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
76 ms
polyfill.min.js
68 ms
thunderbolt-commons.a475be57.bundle.min.js
74 ms
main.1438a05e.bundle.min.js
73 ms
lodash.min.js
72 ms
react.production.min.js
70 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
183 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
195 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
182 ms
47034b_a5e90a138d9147288661eb4ce29dba59.jpg
276 ms
bundle.min.js
77 ms
47034b_8179a99f44b447f1af6ae1d03b649c2b.png
316 ms
47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png
321 ms
47034b_8fa350efe7ee4d9892bb8292f4028b20.jpg
272 ms
47034b_d8a668de85a1443eb0a97369bdce88a0.jpg
310 ms
47034b_751acdf993644ae898fe30d5baa9f6f0.jpg
289 ms
47034b_ab5bec3e6c1f4ff9962cb33d07a8de99.jpg
456 ms
47034b_7f23aa6be94a4ab09127030c6137cb86.jpg
531 ms
47034b_6f6efc2385584300820d44b3ccccdaa5.jpg
539 ms
47034b_e9f1a2cbb8714878871b8b8d73006064.jpg
511 ms
47034b_61d2874bf20e48dca0105e4a12d3f893~mv2.jpg
588 ms
47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png
463 ms
131 ms
132 ms
132 ms
127 ms
125 ms
124 ms
158 ms
160 ms
159 ms
155 ms
153 ms
153 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
6 ms
cacc0862-f146-4746-92b1-60e6114a66c4.woff
11 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
7 ms
bolt-performance
30 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
9 ms
right-arrow.svg
7 ms
beautyshock.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
beautyshock.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
beautyshock.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyshock.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautyshock.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautyshock.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty Shock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: