Tools & Wizards About Us
beautyshock.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

beautyshock.co

Beauty Shock Salon -

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

950 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

beautyshock.co screenshot

About Website

Visit beautyshock.co now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Shock content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautyshock.co

Beauty Shock Salon is Birmingham's newest vibrant beauty lounge. Call 205-224-5584 for booking and appointments

Visit beautyshock.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautyshock.co page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautyshock.co performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.beautyshock.co

77 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

71 ms

minified.js

79 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

76 ms

polyfill.min.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beautyshock.co, 35% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (588 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 212.6 kB (35%)

Content Size

603.2 kB

After Optimization

390.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Beautyshock.co main page is 603.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 288.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 209.3 kB

  • Original 288.5 kB
  • After minification 287.0 kB
  • After compression 79.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 209.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 460 B

  • Original 90.8 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Shock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 223.9 kB
  • After minification 223.9 kB
  • After compression 221.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Shock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.beautyshock.co

www.beautyshock.co

77 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

71 ms

minified.js

minified.js

79 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

76 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

68 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a475be57.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.a475be57.bundle.min.js

74 ms

main.1438a05e.bundle.min.js

main.1438a05e.bundle.min.js

73 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

72 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

70 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

183 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

195 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

182 ms

47034b_a5e90a138d9147288661eb4ce29dba59.jpg

47034b_a5e90a138d9147288661eb4ce29dba59.jpg

276 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

77 ms

47034b_8179a99f44b447f1af6ae1d03b649c2b.png

47034b_8179a99f44b447f1af6ae1d03b649c2b.png

316 ms

47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png

47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png

321 ms

47034b_8fa350efe7ee4d9892bb8292f4028b20.jpg

47034b_8fa350efe7ee4d9892bb8292f4028b20.jpg

272 ms

47034b_d8a668de85a1443eb0a97369bdce88a0.jpg

47034b_d8a668de85a1443eb0a97369bdce88a0.jpg

310 ms

47034b_751acdf993644ae898fe30d5baa9f6f0.jpg

47034b_751acdf993644ae898fe30d5baa9f6f0.jpg

289 ms

47034b_ab5bec3e6c1f4ff9962cb33d07a8de99.jpg

47034b_ab5bec3e6c1f4ff9962cb33d07a8de99.jpg

456 ms

47034b_7f23aa6be94a4ab09127030c6137cb86.jpg

47034b_7f23aa6be94a4ab09127030c6137cb86.jpg

531 ms

47034b_6f6efc2385584300820d44b3ccccdaa5.jpg

47034b_6f6efc2385584300820d44b3ccccdaa5.jpg

539 ms

47034b_e9f1a2cbb8714878871b8b8d73006064.jpg

47034b_e9f1a2cbb8714878871b8b8d73006064.jpg

511 ms

47034b_61d2874bf20e48dca0105e4a12d3f893~mv2.jpg

47034b_61d2874bf20e48dca0105e4a12d3f893~mv2.jpg

588 ms

47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png

47034b_7d5ad175af874a038a52958c35a38a87.png

463 ms

131 ms

132 ms

132 ms

127 ms

125 ms

124 ms

158 ms

160 ms

159 ms

155 ms

153 ms

153 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

6 ms

cacc0862-f146-4746-92b1-60e6114a66c4.woff

cacc0862-f146-4746-92b1-60e6114a66c4.woff

11 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

7 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

30 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

beautyshock.co accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

beautyshock.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beautyshock.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautyshock.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautyshock.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautyshock.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beauty Shock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: