4.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.9 sec
757 ms
Welcome to beautysprint.com homepage info - get ready to check Beautysprint best content right away, or after learning these important things about beautysprint.com
Visit beautysprint.comWe analyzed Beautysprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
beautysprint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value620 ms
48/100
30%
Value0.074
95/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
1083 ms
193 ms
205 ms
224 ms
203 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Beautysprint.com, 30% (25 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautysprint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 354.2 kB (53%)
672.1 kB
317.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautysprint.com main page is 672.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 250.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beautysprint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 128.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.7 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautysprint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (41%)
69
41
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautysprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautysprint.com
1083 ms
bootstrap.min.css
193 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
205 ms
font-awesome.min.css
224 ms
fontello.css
203 ms
style.css
205 ms
css
28 ms
style.css
276 ms
jquery.js
390 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
300 ms
jquery.ajaxQueue.js
300 ms
jquery.stickr.min.js
299 ms
jquery.cookie.js
299 ms
jquery.cart.js
299 ms
adsbygoogle.js
10 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
15 ms
bootstrap.min.js
560 ms
script_basic.js
549 ms
wp-embed.min.js
548 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
287 ms
41p85Rku8fL._SL160_.jpg
178 ms
1(36).png
182 ms
37.jpg
241 ms
Jessica.jpg
189 ms
star_full.png
189 ms
Thomas.jpg
188 ms
Robby.jpg
187 ms
Jenny.jpg
236 ms
tiffany.jpg
237 ms
Tommy.jpg
237 ms
21tpmC36fqL._SL160_.jpg
142 ms
514%2BXxiyrML._SL160_.jpg
143 ms
41B2DTlhWML._SL160_.jpg
142 ms
51hB8YyUzOL._SL160_.jpg
144 ms
41q-6HgK03L._SL160_.jpg
143 ms
51A13FlRhdL._SL160_.jpg
144 ms
11mHg8TQNlL._SL160_.jpg
145 ms
610of58nvxL._SL160_.jpg
229 ms
41cYPxZibWL._SL160_.jpg
145 ms
418ghip0w3L._SL160_.jpg
145 ms
319-CqUXEiL._SL160_.jpg
184 ms
519SK49T18L._SL160_.jpg
145 ms
41vRcNaYJ2L._SL160_.jpg
228 ms
21mC6E0EB4L._SL160_.jpg
145 ms
51U3ycQW3JL._SL160_.jpg
168 ms
41wGPAHpZdL._SL160_.jpg
159 ms
41Rgqu4rrwL._SL160_.jpg
166 ms
41ltlZnjzkL._SL160_.jpg
168 ms
31FRgxCQ9CL._SL160_.jpg
169 ms
41ot6iZlzNL._SL160_.jpg
168 ms
41ukglgnHmL._SL160_.jpg
180 ms
51vOOLjbFAL._SL160_.jpg
169 ms
416Vjx3ws-L._SL160_.jpg
169 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
51 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
705 ms
fontello.woff
102 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
45 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxkCDe67GEgBv_HnyvHTfdew.woff
46 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff
45 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
47 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxh_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
46 ms
ca-pub-9855681284749614.js
586 ms
zrt_lookup.html
583 ms
show_ads_impl.js
166 ms
cm
549 ms
bast_rated.png
501 ms
stars.png
501 ms
popular.png
500 ms
ads
644 ms
osd.js
27 ms
us_banner_baby_728x90.gif
37 ms
35 ms
4132373776523598560
79 ms
abg.js
81 ms
m_js_controller.js
102 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
76 ms
s
61 ms
x_button_blue2.png
61 ms
beautysprint.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
beautysprint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
beautysprint.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautysprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautysprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautysprint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautysprint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: