4.5 sec in total
1 sec
3.3 sec
188 ms
Visit beautytalk.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Beautytalk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautytalk.co.uk
I offer permanent make-up treatments and training, electrolysis hair removal and thread vein removal. Treatments are carried out in salons in Letchworth, Stevenage, Hitchin, Welwyn, Bedford, Milton Ke...
Visit beautytalk.co.ukWe analyzed Beautytalk.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
beautytalk.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.577
12/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
1046 ms
169 ms
263 ms
359 ms
186 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Beautytalk.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Beautytalk.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 635.5 kB (54%)
1.2 MB
532.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautytalk.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 623.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beautytalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 219.4 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 298.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautytalk.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (49%)
55
28
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beautytalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.beautytalk.co.uk
1046 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
169 ms
font-awesome.min.css
263 ms
style.css
359 ms
styles.css
186 ms
meteor-slides.css
187 ms
twitter-feed.css
188 ms
wpacc-genesis-dropdown.css
267 ms
css
32 ms
gallery.min.css
279 ms
style.css
280 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
281 ms
jquery.js
525 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
359 ms
facebook.js
751 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
566 ms
jquery.metadata.v2.js
382 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
445 ms
slideshow.js
453 ms
jquery.form.min.js
496 ms
scripts.js
463 ms
wpacc-genesis-dropdown.js
476 ms
zero-spam.min.js
542 ms
mobile-menu.js
550 ms
home-slider.js
570 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
588 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
590 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
629 ms
header.png
741 ms
logo.png
90 ms
slide12.jpg
97 ms
slide22.jpg
97 ms
slide51.jpg
89 ms
slide42.jpg
187 ms
slide32.jpg
180 ms
bg-h4.png
179 ms
about-me-fi1.jpg
196 ms
bg-more-category.png
195 ms
Accredited-Logo-copy.jpg
442 ms
treatments-fi.jpg
268 ms
makeup-fi1.jpg
281 ms
slide42-285x100.jpg
288 ms
CPD-badge-285x100.jpg
288 ms
bg-footer-widgets.png
443 ms
rsz_incollage_20210913_094415174__02__01-190x200.jpg
374 ms
incollage_20211030_171211058__-190x200.jpg
389 ms
rsz_incollage_20211028_153121446-200x200.jpg
390 ms
rsz_incollage_20211030_141643858-200x200.jpg
469 ms
rsz_5img_20191211_111028__01-200x165.jpg
483 ms
rsz_incollage_20211025_222932600__01-200x168.jpg
484 ms
rsz_1img_20171006_152357_01_01-200x142.jpg
528 ms
rsz_incollage_20211025_223533207__01__01__01-200x132.jpg
531 ms
rsz_1img_20180904_143406__01-200x114.jpg
562 ms
bg-footer-widgets-bot.png
577 ms
bg-search.png
577 ms
sdk.js
16 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
12 ms
6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xA.woff
19 ms
fontello.woff
537 ms
sdk.js
6 ms
beautytalk.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
beautytalk.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
beautytalk.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautytalk.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautytalk.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
beautytalk.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beautytalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: