4.9 sec in total
295 ms
4.3 sec
304 ms
Click here to check amazing Beauty Tech content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about beautytech.com
BeautyTech.com and BeautyTech.info are now closed. BeautyTech.com 1996 Webmaster Debbie Doerrlamm founded BeautyTech.com — a virtual forum and community for nail, hair, skin care, and tanning profess...
Visit beautytech.comWe analyzed Beautytech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
beautytech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value4,050 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
295 ms
69 ms
194 ms
138 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Beautytech.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Nailtech.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Nailtech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 315.8 kB (28%)
1.1 MB
795.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Beautytech.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 210.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beauty Tech needs image optimization as it can save up to 210.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautytech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (41%)
59
35
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
beautytech.com
295 ms
css3.css
69 ms
global.css
194 ms
stylesheet.css
138 ms
portal.css
200 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
ddaccordion.js
667 ms
banners236L.pl
1622 ms
banners.pl
1626 ms
banners236R.pl
2614 ms
banners600.pl
2627 ms
slide_shelves.jpg
3313 ms
head_back.gif
2479 ms
logo_main.gif
2480 ms
icon_mini_portal.gif
1016 ms
icon_mini_forums.gif
1019 ms
Cart_Icon.gif
1081 ms
icon_ntcom.gif
1084 ms
facebook_like.png
1145 ms
twitter.png
1149 ms
pinterest.png
1211 ms
youtube.png
1215 ms
calendar.png
1275 ms
icon_mini_register.gif
1281 ms
icon_mini_faq.gif
1341 ms
icon_mini_staff.gif
1348 ms
icon_mini_search.gif
1407 ms
comment_icon.png
1414 ms
iconGlobe.png
1474 ms
icon_mini_chatroom.gif
1479 ms
resources.png
1538 ms
icon_mini_album.gif
1544 ms
advertise.png
1603 ms
icon2.gif
1610 ms
loading2.gif
70 ms
bg.png
1944 ms
thead.png
72 ms
spacer.gif
70 ms
nailtechcom.jpg
211 ms
Ejr16pres.JPG
2359 ms
red_bul0.gif
138 ms
MMJR13.JPG
138 ms
calendar_graphic.jpg
143 ms
ESR8S.JPG
208 ms
featured2.gif
209 ms
canes236x60.jpg
345 ms
world.jpg
403 ms
icon_mini_search.gif
276 ms
enh1-1c.jpg
285 ms
cina236x60.jpg
849 ms
soeasy.jpg
918 ms
papers236x60.jpg
132 ms
tcat.png
68 ms
eco600.jpg
353 ms
widgets.js
8 ms
btp_AD8.jpg
1123 ms
6128.jpg
1059 ms
98090.jpg
1115 ms
98834_Dot.jpg
1154 ms
PC404.jpg
1149 ms
beautytech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
beautytech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
beautytech.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautytech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Beautytech.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
beautytech.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Tech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: