6.1 sec in total
483 ms
4.8 sec
815 ms
Click here to check amazing Bedd content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bedd.in
Visit bedd.inWe analyzed Bedd.in page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
bedd.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value4.0 s
51/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
483 ms
1094 ms
208 ms
413 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Bedd.in, 24% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Bedd.in.
Page size can be reduced by 160.0 kB (13%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Bedd.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 823.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 154.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bedd images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 137 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bedd.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (75%)
64
16
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bedd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bedd.in
483 ms
bedd.in
1094 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
208 ms
main.min.css
413 ms
css
28 ms
main.css
596 ms
style.min.css
598 ms
styles.css
608 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
610 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
616 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
622 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
795 ms
swiper.min.css
793 ms
post-12.css
810 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
812 ms
post-13.css
822 ms
frontend.css
828 ms
post-1428.css
988 ms
post-1431.css
992 ms
post-1767.css
1010 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1018 ms
solid.min.css
1028 ms
brands.min.css
1034 ms
jquery.min.js
1381 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1190 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
1212 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1220 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
1234 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
1239 ms
frontend.min.js
1484 ms
app.js
1484 ms
index.js
1485 ms
index.js
1485 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1485 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1580 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1594 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1616 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1631 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1646 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1469 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1374 ms
hooks.min.js
1200 ms
i18n.min.js
1230 ms
frontend.min.js
1235 ms
waypoints.min.js
1254 ms
core.min.js
1256 ms
frontend.min.js
1356 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1198 ms
underscore.min.js
1234 ms
wp-util.min.js
1236 ms
frontend.min.js
1258 ms
Bedd-Logo-109x58-3.png
651 ms
bike-hero.jpg
1324 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-04-1024x683.jpg
952 ms
wifi.jpg
1000 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-01.jpg
1015 ms
53169479_392713834611823_2877944674654355456_n.jpg
1048 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-05.jpg
1053 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-05-2.jpg
1348 ms
Aniruddh-bhawan-4.jpg
1205 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-04.jpg
1220 ms
PHOTO-2023-05-30-05-09-02.jpg
1462 ms
accessories-6.jpg
1674 ms
placeholder.png
1407 ms
WhatsApp-Image-2023-07-18-at-22.59.29sqa-542x1024.jpg
1575 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
45 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
36 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
44 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
44 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
44 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
47 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
45 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
45 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf
47 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
47 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf
213 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
173 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1659 ms
sykr-yRtm7EvTrXNxkv5jfKKyDCAKHDi.ttf
77 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tdE3U3f4c.ttf
165 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8tvE3U3f4c.ttf
67 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8sDE3U3f4c.ttf
67 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8uDFHU3f4c.ttf
107 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8u6FHU3f4c.ttf
91 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8vdFHU3f4c.ttf
134 ms
iJWbBXyIfDnIV7nEt3KSJbVDV49rz8v0FHU3f4c.ttf
92 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1687 ms
bedd.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bedd.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bedd.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bedd.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bedd.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bedd.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bedd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: