2.7 sec in total
222 ms
1.7 sec
771 ms
Click here to check amazing Bed Tester content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bedtester.com
Welcome to Bed Tester! We are here to make your mattress shopping experience an enjoyable one. Check our latest mattress reviews today!
Visit bedtester.comWe analyzed Bedtester.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
bedtester.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value20.5 s
0/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,580 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.6 s
1/100
10%
222 ms
218 ms
85 ms
131 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Bedtester.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (633 ms) belongs to the original domain Bedtester.com.
Page size can be reduced by 111.5 kB (4%)
2.6 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Bedtester.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bed Tester images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 567 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (81%)
93
18
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bed Tester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bedtester.com
222 ms
bedtester.com
218 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
wpautoterms.css
103 ms
styles.css
135 ms
thrive_flat.css
192 ms
style.css
118 ms
eggrehub.css
159 ms
style.css
247 ms
iconstyle.css
248 ms
ajaxsearch.css
246 ms
elementor.css
180 ms
jquery.min.js
259 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
296 ms
price_alert.js
272 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
274 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
290 ms
dom-ready.min.js
288 ms
base.js
355 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
342 ms
masonry.min.js
329 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
401 ms
general.min.js
399 ms
moxie.min.js
347 ms
css
46 ms
css
66 ms
mailchimp.css
366 ms
index.js
528 ms
acf-dynamic-elements.min.js
530 ms
audio.min.js
396 ms
contact-form-compat.min.js
559 ms
content-reveal.min.js
558 ms
countdown.min.js
558 ms
dropdown.min.js
559 ms
divider.min.js
558 ms
plupload.min.js
586 ms
file-upload.min.js
633 ms
fill-counter.min.js
632 ms
number-counter.min.js
602 ms
image-gallery-libs.min.js
589 ms
image-gallery.min.js
574 ms
lead-generation.min.js
555 ms
login.min.js
547 ms
menu.min.js
577 ms
number-counter-compat.min.js
550 ms
post-grid-compat.min.js
565 ms
pagination.min.js
508 ms
post-list.min.js
500 ms
pricing-table.min.js
497 ms
progress-bar.min.js
534 ms
social-share.min.js
522 ms
table.min.js
518 ms
tabs.min.js
538 ms
timer.min.js
518 ms
toc.min.js
554 ms
toggle.min.js
555 ms
twitter.min.js
520 ms
user-profile.min.js
538 ms
video.min.js
553 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
525 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
557 ms
frontend.min.js
528 ms
analytics.js
168 ms
gtm.js
214 ms
inview.js
483 ms
pgwmodal.js
393 ms
unveil.js
436 ms
hoverintent.js
447 ms
vglnk.js
81 ms
load.sumo.com
77 ms
countdown.js
417 ms
custom.js
450 ms
jquery.sticky.js
440 ms
ajaxsearch.js
451 ms
bedtesterlogo-blue.jpg
480 ms
bedtesterbanner.jpg
533 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
82 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
85 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
115 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
130 ms
linkid.js
20 ms
rhicons.ttf
453 ms
commerce-js.iife.js
85 ms
loader.min.js
84 ms
collect
44 ms
bed-1013957_1920.jpg
461 ms
decision-1013752_1920.jpg
428 ms
cup-1013619_1920.jpg
458 ms
percent-1019730_1920.jpg
487 ms
white-male-1856207_1920.jpg
438 ms
js
81 ms
question-mark-1026526_1920.jpg
433 ms
newton-baby-mattress-review-bedtester.jpg
492 ms
nolah-mattress-review.jpg
497 ms
4-vacuum-baking-soda.jpg
451 ms
long-lasting-mattress-topper.jpg
433 ms
puffy-post.jpg
490 ms
image.png
516 ms
mobilelogo.png
431 ms
bedtester.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
bedtester.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
bedtester.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bedtester.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bedtester.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bedtester.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bed Tester. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: