Tools & Wizards About Us
beeppool.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

beeppool.org

beeppool.org

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

580 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

beeppool.org screenshot

About Website

Visit beeppool.org now to see the best up-to-date Beeppool content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beeppool.org

This domain may be for sale!

Visit beeppool.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Beeppool.org page load time and found that the first response time was 580 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beeppool.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.beeppool.org

580 ms

saledefault.css

8 ms

style.css

11 ms

zeropark.css

10 ms

sale_form.js

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Beeppool.org, 29% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 21% (3 requests) were made to D38psrni17bvxu.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (892 ms) relates to the external source Brigi-jar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.8 kB (42%)

Content Size

35.7 kB

After Optimization

20.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beeppool.org main page is 35.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 24.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 918 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 24.4 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Beeppool needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 833 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 619 B
  • After compression 408 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 833 B or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beeppool.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beeppool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.beeppool.org

ww38.beeppool.org

580 ms

saledefault.css

saledefault.css

8 ms

style.css

style.css

11 ms

zeropark.css

zeropark.css

10 ms

sale_form.js

sale_form.js

294 ms

lander

lander

892 ms

css

css

143 ms

style.css

style.css

24 ms

main.js

main.js

102 ms

css

css

130 ms

css

css

131 ms

css

css

127 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

71 ms

empty.gif

empty.gif

32 ms

SEO Factors

beeppool.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beeppool.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beeppool.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beeppool.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beeppool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: