Tools & Wizards About Us
beeptoolkit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

beeptoolkit.com

BEEPTOOLKIT - IDE Platform for development of Robotics, Automatics & Smart Systems

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

beeptoolkit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beeptoolkit.com now to see the best up-to-date BEEPTOOLKIT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beeptoolkit.com

Beeptec Engineering presents Beeptoolkit - Tool FOR STARTUPS As it is in the box, it is in demand by R&D structures and independent developers. Allows you to translate into a boxed product a rather im...

Visit beeptoolkit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beeptoolkit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beeptoolkit.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.beeptoolkit.com

94 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

33 ms

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

93 ms

polyfill.min.js

276 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Beeptoolkit.com, 38% (18 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 581.1 kB (58%)

Content Size

996.1 kB

After Optimization

415.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Beeptoolkit.com main page is 996.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 573.5 kB

  • Original 706.2 kB
  • After minification 704.5 kB
  • After compression 132.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 573.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. BEEPTOOLKIT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 237.6 kB
  • After minification 237.5 kB
  • After compression 234.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of BEEPTOOLKIT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.beeptoolkit.com

www.beeptoolkit.com

94 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

33 ms

minified.js

minified.js

35 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

93 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

276 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8a430009.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8a430009.bundle.min.js

76 ms

main.0ed20bfc.bundle.min.js

main.0ed20bfc.bundle.min.js

75 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

75 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

75 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

78 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

76 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

76 ms

3c21e1_7814969dbff445c6b65a650c2a0820aff000.jpg

3c21e1_7814969dbff445c6b65a650c2a0820aff000.jpg

392 ms

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

btn_buynowCC_LG.gif

160 ms

3c21e1_93ef3e17f88140498908d926aea400b9~mv2.jpg

3c21e1_93ef3e17f88140498908d926aea400b9~mv2.jpg

608 ms

3c21e1_5750011aa64049029af4bd2aab69c12b~mv2.jpg

3c21e1_5750011aa64049029af4bd2aab69c12b~mv2.jpg

527 ms

No-code.jpg

No-code.jpg

552 ms

3c21e1_2ab176783b3b4d90b0b96a6446fb2628~mv2.png

3c21e1_2ab176783b3b4d90b0b96a6446fb2628~mv2.png

593 ms

3c21e1_e789dae20bd548168326de39927c4fd8~mv2.png

3c21e1_e789dae20bd548168326de39927c4fd8~mv2.png

590 ms

Front.png

Front.png

547 ms

Front%20P%2006.png

Front%20P%2006.png

648 ms

3c21e1_4c4fd957e0e14065abe60986bef4e000~mv2.jpg

3c21e1_4c4fd957e0e14065abe60986bef4e000~mv2.jpg

688 ms

Front%20P%20New.png

Front%20P%20New.png

672 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

158 ms

512.png

512.png

7 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

112 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

5 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

5 ms

124 ms

114 ms

117 ms

113 ms

109 ms

110 ms

156 ms

152 ms

146 ms

149 ms

150 ms

143 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

17 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

3 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

7 ms

Accessibility Review

beeptoolkit.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

beeptoolkit.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

beeptoolkit.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beeptoolkit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beeptoolkit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beeptoolkit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of BEEPTOOLKIT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: