9 sec in total
801 ms
7.8 sec
350 ms
Visit benchmarkestimating.com now to see the best up-to-date Benchmark Estimating content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about benchmarkestimating.com
Revolutionise your estimating with Benchmark. Get Benchmark Estimating Software & Grow Your Business.
Visit benchmarkestimating.comWe analyzed Benchmarkestimating.com page load time and found that the first response time was 801 ms and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
benchmarkestimating.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
801 ms
971 ms
1495 ms
255 ms
501 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Benchmarkestimating.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Benchmarkestimating.com.
Page size can be reduced by 921.1 kB (53%)
1.7 MB
823.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Benchmarkestimating.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 582.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 121.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benchmark Estimating images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 286.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 286.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 480.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benchmarkestimating.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 480.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (55%)
74
33
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benchmark Estimating. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
benchmarkestimating.com
801 ms
benchmarkestimating.com
971 ms
www.benchmarkestimating.com
1495 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
255 ms
sidebar-login.css
501 ms
grid.css
736 ms
base.css
724 ms
layout.css
966 ms
shortcodes.css
984 ms
magnific-popup.css
723 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
739 ms
red_k.css
1208 ms
custom.css
964 ms
style.css
965 ms
gravity-mod.css
992 ms
layerslider.css
1215 ms
jetpack.css
1216 ms
jquery.js
1470 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1244 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1242 ms
sidebar-login.min.js
1492 ms
avia-compat.js
1454 ms
greensock.js
1711 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1740 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1492 ms
gf.placeholders.js
1733 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
1731 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
27 ms
gprofiles.js
164 ms
wpgroho.js
1727 ms
avia.js
1983 ms
shortcodes.js
2213 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1962 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2209 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1994 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1995 ms
e-201611.js
30 ms
analytics.js
76 ms
be_logo_web.png
796 ms
home_video_001.jpg
1032 ms
DemoV002_dollars.jpg
795 ms
DemoV002_pounds.jpg
792 ms
DemoV003_dollars.jpg
792 ms
button_005.png
792 ms
home_event_001.jpg
1801 ms
button_006_03.png
1061 ms
home_uk_001.jpg
1802 ms
button_03.png
1036 ms
home_rewards_001.jpg
1549 ms
New-box1.png
1528 ms
thumb_civenex_200-80x80.jpg
1282 ms
thumb_Vella-80x80.jpg
1342 ms
thumb_local_gov.jpg
1527 ms
thumb_uk-80x80.jpg
1589 ms
thumb_webinar-80x80.jpg
1801 ms
thumb_nbn-80x80.jpg
1802 ms
thumb_video-80x80.jpg
1801 ms
thumb_airbus-80x80.jpg
2098 ms
thumb_chat.jpg
2101 ms
thumb_downer_002-80x80.jpg
2099 ms
thumb_OnCenter.jpg
2100 ms
multi_languages-80x80.jpg
2099 ms
thumbnail_v77_b.png
2100 ms
reward_icon.png
2311 ms
LOGO_colas_250.jpg
2253 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
2513 ms
linkid.js
5 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
53 ms
capture.js
532 ms
skin.css
1686 ms
hovercard.css
336 ms
services.css
336 ms
g.gif
42 ms
widget_v2.134.js
16 ms
capture.php
155 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
110 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
1 ms
print.css
244 ms
benchmarkestimating.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
benchmarkestimating.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
benchmarkestimating.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benchmarkestimating.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Benchmarkestimating.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
benchmarkestimating.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Benchmark Estimating. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: