Tools & Wizards About Us
benchmarklitigation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

benchmarklitigation.com

Benchmark Litigation - The definitive guide to litigation firms and attorneys in the United States and Canada.

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

benchmarklitigation.com screenshot

About Website

Visit benchmarklitigation.com now to see the best up-to-date Benchmark Litigation content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about benchmarklitigation.com

Benchmark Litigation is the definitive guide to litigation firms and attorneys in the United States and Canada.

Visit benchmarklitigation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Benchmarklitigation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

benchmarklitigation.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value44,800 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value58.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

benchmarklitigation.com

1040 ms

bootstrap.min.css

229 ms

jquery-ui.css

105 ms

jQuery-ui-Slider-Pips.css

378 ms

gpt.js

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Benchmarklitigation.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Benchmarklitigation.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 155.9 kB (20%)

Content Size

770.7 kB

After Optimization

614.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Benchmarklitigation.com main page is 770.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 360.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 360.0 kB
  • After minification 324.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benchmark Litigation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 56.1 kB

  • Original 281.8 kB
  • After minification 281.4 kB
  • After compression 225.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.1 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 77.0 kB
  • After minification 76.9 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benchmarklitigation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (79%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benchmark Litigation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

benchmarklitigation.com

benchmarklitigation.com

1040 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

229 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

105 ms

jQuery-ui-Slider-Pips.css

jQuery-ui-Slider-Pips.css

378 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

154 ms

theme.css

theme.css

369 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

251 ms

screen.css

screen.css

362 ms

yamm.css

yamm.css

407 ms

custom.css

custom.css

416 ms

podcasts.css

podcasts.css

417 ms

css

css

233 ms

PecrWebSite.css

PecrWebSite.css

352 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

433 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

232 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

355 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

850 ms

bootstrap.bundle.js

bootstrap.bundle.js

1136 ms

bootbox.js

bootbox.js

728 ms

respond.js

respond.js

625 ms

hogan-2.0.0.js

hogan-2.0.0.js

624 ms

handlebars-v4.7.6.js

handlebars-v4.7.6.js

654 ms

lz-string-1.3.3-min.js

lz-string-1.3.3-min.js

653 ms

typeahead.bundle.js

typeahead.bundle.js

654 ms

equalize.js

equalize.js

841 ms

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1-min.js

846 ms

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1.js

jquery.scrollTo-1.4.3.1.js

840 ms

custom-extensions.js

custom-extensions.js

845 ms

iflr.autocomplete.js

iflr.autocomplete.js

928 ms

jstorage.js

jstorage.js

912 ms

hmac-sha256.js

hmac-sha256.js

1182 ms

enc-base64-min.js

enc-base64-min.js

1193 ms

iflr.common.js

iflr.common.js

1195 ms

iflr.client-storage.js

iflr.client-storage.js

1195 ms

iflr.security.js

iflr.security.js

1195 ms

xdr.js

xdr.js

1263 ms

jquery.validate.bootstrap.extensions.js

jquery.validate.bootstrap.extensions.js

1280 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

1264 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.extensions.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.extensions.js

1271 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

1247 ms

limitnumberofmails.js

limitnumberofmails.js

1266 ms

boolean.required.validation.attribute.js

boolean.required.validation.attribute.js

1331 ms

centerInClient.js

centerInClient.js

314 ms

CookieAccepterInit.js

CookieAccepterInit.js

618 ms

js

js

1358 ms

pubads_impl_2022092701.js

pubads_impl_2022092701.js

49 ms

ppub_config

ppub_config

140 ms

searchUrlRedirection.js

searchUrlRedirection.js

1171 ms

iflr1000.gtm.js

iflr1000.gtm.js

1212 ms

home.js

home.js

1102 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

1067 ms

af86cccc-dbfc-4fc1-8d32-7143a814b82a.json

af86cccc-dbfc-4fc1-8d32-7143a814b82a.json

16 ms

Benchmark-Litigation-logo.png

Benchmark-Litigation-logo.png

1004 ms

Benchmark-Litigation-logo-small.png

Benchmark-Litigation-logo-small.png

1005 ms

BM-home-page-graphic.jpg

BM-home-page-graphic.jpg

1005 ms

APAC_Research_participation_v1.jpg

APAC_Research_participation_v1.jpg

1011 ms

US_Research_participation_v1.jpg

US_Research_participation_v1.jpg

998 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

158 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

268 ms

integrator.js

integrator.js

362 ms

ads

ads

125 ms

container.html

container.html

269 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

834 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

255 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

274 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

303 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

409 ms

get-loader.js

get-loader.js

407 ms

7bba85b8-749e-4742-9cee-56c345ac6046.js

7bba85b8-749e-4742-9cee-56c345ac6046.js

386 ms

js

js

108 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

158 ms

my-wisepop

my-wisepop

573 ms

inspectlet.js

inspectlet.js

353 ms

collect

collect

324 ms

collect

collect

424 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

479 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

88 ms

Accessibility Review

benchmarklitigation.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

benchmarklitigation.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

benchmarklitigation.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benchmarklitigation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Benchmarklitigation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

benchmarklitigation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Benchmark Litigation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: