Tools & Wizards About Us
benchmarkperformance.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

benchmarkperformance.com

Benchmark Performance | Toronto, ON | Instructional Design

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

61 ms

benchmarkperformance.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Benchmark Performance content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about benchmarkperformance.com

Benchmark started in 1986 with a simple mission – to help people and organizations perform. More than thirty years later, our focus on performance hasn’t changed; neither has the collaborative, agile ...

Visit benchmarkperformance.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Benchmarkperformance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

benchmarkperformance.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.benchmarkperformance.com

84 ms

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Benchmarkperformance.com, 34% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 34% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 525.7 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

534.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Benchmarkperformance.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 642.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 504.4 kB

  • Original 642.0 kB
  • After minification 640.2 kB
  • After compression 137.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 504.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 158.5 kB
  • After minification 140.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Benchmark Performance needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.6 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (33%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benchmark Performance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.benchmarkperformance.com

www.benchmarkperformance.com

84 ms

minified.js

minified.js

37 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

34 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

110 ms

main.9a8f299d.bundle.min.js

main.9a8f299d.bundle.min.js

113 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

110 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

110 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

111 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

114 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

111 ms

aee9ba_9bddce61e2f5480bb79593f8bff0fdda~mv2.png

aee9ba_9bddce61e2f5480bb79593f8bff0fdda~mv2.png

355 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

58 ms

aee9ba_d35f32580ff74a3aacd88497623f7fd8~mv2_d_3600_2400_s_4_2.jpg

aee9ba_d35f32580ff74a3aacd88497623f7fd8~mv2_d_3600_2400_s_4_2.jpg

228 ms

aee9ba_675355582fe0486e88e8fdbe9eb7f973~mv2.png

aee9ba_675355582fe0486e88e8fdbe9eb7f973~mv2.png

277 ms

aee9ba_d7e174f0e37043eeafffdf5851d743ce~mv2.png

aee9ba_d7e174f0e37043eeafffdf5851d743ce~mv2.png

221 ms

aee9ba_286c44e9680342038e26feb2d3f1e82c~mv2.png

aee9ba_286c44e9680342038e26feb2d3f1e82c~mv2.png

309 ms

aee9ba_617cda6e62164241bc2262c6933d22ad~mv2.png

aee9ba_617cda6e62164241bc2262c6933d22ad~mv2.png

230 ms

aee9ba_2aeb00a6f94d4e0b84a1b2bb1f66e26f~mv2.png

aee9ba_2aeb00a6f94d4e0b84a1b2bb1f66e26f~mv2.png

439 ms

aee9ba_07ae95818b9e458c852ac22c7f347675~mv2.png

aee9ba_07ae95818b9e458c852ac22c7f347675~mv2.png

452 ms

aee9ba_a9af0c5f8cb1456abc45d4e3f0ac9dcd~mv2_d_1920_1266_s_2.png

aee9ba_a9af0c5f8cb1456abc45d4e3f0ac9dcd~mv2_d_1920_1266_s_2.png

490 ms

aee9ba_802642c3343a47bcbe57a403e8d5a080~mv2.webp

aee9ba_802642c3343a47bcbe57a403e8d5a080~mv2.webp

283 ms

aee9ba_a52cb510f4d047c986f7f95ba4230578~mv2.webp

aee9ba_a52cb510f4d047c986f7f95ba4230578~mv2.webp

431 ms

aee9ba_a52cb510f4d047c986f7f95ba4230578~mv2.webp

aee9ba_a52cb510f4d047c986f7f95ba4230578~mv2.webp

423 ms

aee9ba_c92b6002c5e44227b5b456badacf9945~mv2.webp

aee9ba_c92b6002c5e44227b5b456badacf9945~mv2.webp

502 ms

aee9ba_fa7e3712e63a419a85161b26073510bd~mv2.png

aee9ba_fa7e3712e63a419a85161b26073510bd~mv2.png

673 ms

aee9ba_c1e03536059f42418106c633e41f2ea2~mv2.png

aee9ba_c1e03536059f42418106c633e41f2ea2~mv2.png

675 ms

118 ms

118 ms

118 ms

113 ms

112 ms

110 ms

148 ms

147 ms

146 ms

142 ms

144 ms

146 ms

kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff

kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff

11 ms

I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff

I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff

4 ms

file.woff

file.woff

408 ms

file.woff

file.woff

398 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

17 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

benchmarkperformance.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

benchmarkperformance.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

benchmarkperformance.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benchmarkperformance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Benchmarkperformance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

benchmarkperformance.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Benchmark Performance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: