Tools & Wizards About Us
benefic.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

benefic.net

Benefic - Building Better Developers through Benefic Experiences

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

37 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

benefic.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to benefic.net homepage info - get ready to check Benefic best content right away, or after learning these important things about benefic.net

Benefic provides insights on practices, technologies, and tools to help developers produce quality work.

Visit benefic.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Benefic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 37 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

benefic.net performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.349

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

benefic.net

37 ms

benefic.net

1196 ms

js

73 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

268 ms

style.min.css

316 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Benefic.net, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Benefic.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

530.2 kB

After Optimization

461.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Benefic.net main page is 530.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 290.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 400 B

  • Original 135.4 kB
  • After minification 135.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benefic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 449 B

  • Original 290.4 kB
  • After minification 290.4 kB
  • After compression 289.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 23.4 kB
  • After compression 20.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benefic.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (44%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benefic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

benefic.net

benefic.net

37 ms

benefic.net

benefic.net

1196 ms

js

js

73 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

268 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

316 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

276 ms

rounded-thumbs.min.css

rounded-thumbs.min.css

261 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

273 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

348 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

434 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

444 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

378 ms

small-menu.js

small-menu.js

391 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

30 ms

all.js

all.js

29 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

39 ms

in.js

in.js

35 ms

ga_social_tracking.js

ga_social_tracking.js

139 ms

noise.png

noise.png

253 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

244 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

247 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

240 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

263 ms

email.png

email.png

291 ms

rss.png

rss.png

484 ms

header-willow-bench_benefic3.jpg

header-willow-bench_benefic3.jpg

484 ms

Power-View-Use-Latitude-and-Longitude-Stored-in-SSAS-e1450372973424-150x150.jpg

Power-View-Use-Latitude-and-Longitude-Stored-in-SSAS-e1450372973424-150x150.jpg

482 ms

SSMSBoost-Enhancements-to-Boost-your-Productivity-in-SSMS-1-150x150.jpg

SSMSBoost-Enhancements-to-Boost-your-Productivity-in-SSMS-1-150x150.jpg

495 ms

ADoSI-Automated-Defragmentation-of-SQL-Indexes-1-150x150.jpg

ADoSI-Automated-Defragmentation-of-SQL-Indexes-1-150x150.jpg

505 ms

Pass-or-Fail-SQL-Agent-Job-Based-on-Batch-Execution-Results-1-150x150.jpg

Pass-or-Fail-SQL-Agent-Job-Based-on-Batch-Execution-Results-1-150x150.jpg

536 ms

SSIS-FTP-File-Modification-Date-2-150x150.jpg

SSIS-FTP-File-Modification-Date-2-150x150.jpg

723 ms

SSIS-FTP-Connection-Manager-2-150x150.jpg

SSIS-FTP-Connection-Manager-2-150x150.jpg

724 ms

SSRS_Superscripts_and_Subscripts_2-150x150.jpg

SSRS_Superscripts_and_Subscripts_2-150x150.jpg

876 ms

SSIS-ETL-Handling-Character-Encodings-and-Conversions-3-150x150.jpg

SSIS-ETL-Handling-Character-Encodings-and-Conversions-3-150x150.jpg

1662 ms

Execute-package-script-task-title-1-150x150.jpg

Execute-package-script-task-title-1-150x150.jpg

1664 ms

SQL-agent-job-B-steps-Title-1-150x150.jpg

SQL-agent-job-B-steps-Title-1-150x150.jpg

1869 ms

neIFzCqgsI0mp9CI_oU.ttf

neIFzCqgsI0mp9CI_oU.ttf

96 ms

neIIzCqgsI0mp9gz25WBFqk.ttf

neIIzCqgsI0mp9gz25WBFqk.ttf

97 ms

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWA.ttf

raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWA.ttf

97 ms

all.js

all.js

72 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

65 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

21 ms

settings

settings

96 ms

print.css

print.css

245 ms

Accessibility Review

benefic.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

benefic.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

benefic.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benefic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Benefic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

benefic.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Benefic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: