Tools & Wizards About Us
benefont.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 94

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

benefont.com

Benefont -a leading home products manufacturer in China

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

558 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

120 ms

benefont.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Benefont content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about benefont.com

Benefont Co.,Ltd established in 1998 is a leading home products manufacturer in China. We innovate so that our customers get better products that deliver value and performance for consumers. We'r...

Visit benefont.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Benefont.com page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

benefont.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.234

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

benefont.com

558 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

63 ms

layerslider.css

121 ms

css

21 ms

settings.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Benefont.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (558 ms) belongs to the original domain Benefont.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 297.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Benefont.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 882.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 38.6 kB

  • Original 48.8 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 882.3 kB
  • After minification 851.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Benefont images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 164.6 kB

  • Original 398.6 kB
  • After minification 398.3 kB
  • After compression 234.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.6 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 120.0 kB
  • After minification 112.0 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Benefont.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (79%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Benefont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

benefont.com

benefont.com

558 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

63 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

121 ms

css

css

21 ms

settings.css

settings.css

126 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

122 ms

rt-css-framework.css

rt-css-framework.css

122 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

124 ms

jackbox.min.css

jackbox.min.css

122 ms

style.css

style.css

296 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

182 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

183 ms

progression-player.css

progression-player.css

184 ms

skin-minimal-light.css

skin-minimal-light.css

183 ms

isotope.css

isotope.css

185 ms

colortip-1.0-jquery.css

colortip-1.0-jquery.css

242 ms

animate.css

animate.css

248 ms

green-style.css

green-style.css

244 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

18 ms

style.css

style.css

242 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

249 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

363 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

312 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

372 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

313 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

316 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

361 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

399 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

400 ms

jquery.tools.min.js

jquery.tools.min.js

415 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

451 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

452 ms

jackbox-packed.min.js

jackbox-packed.min.js

451 ms

colortip-1.0-jquery.js

colortip-1.0-jquery.js

451 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

452 ms

script.js

script.js

452 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

516 ms

Benefont1.jpg

Benefont1.jpg

133 ms

Benefont-Bath-Accessories.jpg

Benefont-Bath-Accessories.jpg

305 ms

Benefont-Bath-Accessories-G.jpg

Benefont-Bath-Accessories-G.jpg

248 ms

Benefont-Kitchen-Scrubs-W.jpg

Benefont-Kitchen-Scrubs-W.jpg

306 ms

AjaxLoader.gif

AjaxLoader.gif

127 ms

toggle-plus.png

toggle-plus.png

114 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

62 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

63 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

151 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

76 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

js

js

69 ms

Accessibility Review

benefont.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

benefont.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

benefont.com SEO score

94

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Benefont.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Benefont.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

benefont.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Benefont. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: