10.6 sec in total
3.6 sec
5.6 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Bestairfryer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestairfryer.reviews
Best Air Fryer reviews in January 2024. See up-to-date comparisons and prices. Don’t buy an air fryer before reading a useful piece of advice from our top specialists.
Visit bestairfryer.reviewsWe analyzed Bestairfryer.reviews page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
bestairfryer.reviews performance score
3625 ms
56 ms
959 ms
101 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Bestairfryer.reviews, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestairfryer.reviews.
Page size can be reduced by 146.0 kB (18%)
829.2 kB
683.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestairfryer.reviews main page is 829.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 367.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 797 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestairfryer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestairfryer.reviews needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)
65
24
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestairfryer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestairfryer.reviews
3625 ms
gtm.js
56 ms
tag.js
959 ms
hotjar-783354.js
101 ms
wpr-hamburger.css
128 ms
wprmenu.css
456 ms
style.css
450 ms
style.basic.css
462 ms
style-simple-red.css
448 ms
opensans.css
453 ms
new-style.css
288 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
376 ms
modernizr.custom.js
486 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
561 ms
wprmenu.js
562 ms
onejs
6 ms
onejs
6 ms
email-decode.min.js
452 ms
jquery.ajaxsearchlite.min.js
681 ms
wp-embed.min.js
583 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.js
583 ms
main.js
889 ms
ajax.js
682 ms
pagination.js
681 ms
bookmark.js
692 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
modules.0c2aac1b2d1ba79f2a01.js
32 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
32 ms
js
52 ms
ga-audiences
117 ms
js
101 ms
HD9220.jpg
163 ms
GoWISE-USA-5.8-Quart-XL-8-in-1-.jpeg
380 ms
Air-Fryer-by-Cozyna.jpg
380 ms
Secura-4-Liter-4.2-Qt.jpg
381 ms
T-fal-FZ7002-ActiFry-Low-Fat-Healthy-AirFryer-Dishwasher.jpg
233 ms
icon-like.png
245 ms
icon-power.png
380 ms
icon-cleaning.png
381 ms
icon-manipulation.png
457 ms
home-img01.jpg
457 ms
icon-no-comments.png
460 ms
brand1.jpg
456 ms
brand2.png
482 ms
brand3.png
483 ms
brand4.png
564 ms
brand6.png
561 ms
brand7.png
567 ms
brand9.png
571 ms
france.png
585 ms
italy.png
586 ms
germany.png
673 ms
spain.png
670 ms
logo.svg
678 ms
search-icon.svg
670 ms
bg-home01.jpg
1017 ms
crown.svg
692 ms
star.svg
771 ms
icon-pros.svg
775 ms
icon-cons.svg
785 ms
icon3.svg
788 ms
opensans.woff
829 ms
collect
26 ms
opensanslight.woff
884 ms
opensanssemibold.woff
892 ms
opensansbold.woff
907 ms
opensansextrabold.woff
809 ms
collect
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1001 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
iframe_api
64 ms
www-widgetapi.js
6 ms
advert.gif
784 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
133 ms
bestairfryer.reviews SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestairfryer.reviews can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestairfryer.reviews main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestairfryer.reviews
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestairfryer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: