12.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
9.3 sec
2.3 sec
Visit bestchoice.bg now to see the best up-to-date Best Choice content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestchoice.bg
Best Choice gives you the best rela estate offers, like houses, apartments, land, investments for the best price in Bulgaria
Visit bestchoice.bgWe analyzed Bestchoice.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
bestchoice.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value8.4 s
19/100
10%
Value640 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value9.0 s
33/100
10%
1055 ms
454 ms
656 ms
99 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (155 requests) were addressed to the original Bestchoice.bg, 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestchoice.bg.
Page size can be reduced by 177.4 kB (55%)
320.9 kB
143.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestchoice.bg main page is 320.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 197.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 175.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 175.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Choice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (2%)
158
155
The browser has sent 158 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Choice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
en
1055 ms
g=public_css
454 ms
g=public_js
656 ms
js
99 ms
css
74 ms
bestchoice-sign.png
134 ms
bestchoice-logo.png
135 ms
en.png
115 ms
ru.png
229 ms
de.png
240 ms
bg.png
246 ms
hu.png
354 ms
pl.png
354 ms
cs.png
355 ms
ro.png
359 ms
sk.png
360 ms
arrow-left.png
369 ms
image
943 ms
image
924 ms
arrow-right.png
457 ms
image
1119 ms
area.svg
479 ms
rooms.svg
492 ms
bedrooms.svg
570 ms
image
1862 ms
image
1875 ms
image
2375 ms
beach.svg
1037 ms
city.svg
1055 ms
image
1169 ms
image
1189 ms
image
1386 ms
image
1547 ms
image
1341 ms
image
1473 ms
image
1523 ms
image
1610 ms
image
1681 ms
bathrooms.svg
1661 ms
image
2315 ms
analytics.js
114 ms
image
2012 ms
6aez4K2oVqwIvtE2GQ.woff
16 ms
6ae84K2oVqwItm4TCpQy3A.woff
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1710 ms
land.svg
1812 ms
image
2134 ms
collect
26 ms
js
113 ms
image
2911 ms
image
2853 ms
image
2142 ms
image
2095 ms
image
2107 ms
image
2278 ms
image
2178 ms
image
2357 ms
image
2255 ms
image
2268 ms
image
2289 ms
floor.svg
2250 ms
image
2285 ms
image
1954 ms
image
1947 ms
image
1886 ms
image
1943 ms
image
1937 ms
image
1859 ms
image
1875 ms
image
1803 ms
image
1778 ms
image
1720 ms
image
4281 ms
image
1680 ms
image
1786 ms
image
1622 ms
image
1616 ms
image
1490 ms
image
1522 ms
image
1551 ms
image
1491 ms
image
1350 ms
image
1222 ms
image
1348 ms
image
1206 ms
image
1206 ms
image
1162 ms
image
1466 ms
image
1188 ms
image
1133 ms
image
1139 ms
image
1088 ms
image
1138 ms
image
1142 ms
image
1134 ms
image
1088 ms
image
1128 ms
image
1146 ms
image
1131 ms
image
1070 ms
image
1311 ms
image
1101 ms
image
1125 ms
image
1115 ms
image
1130 ms
image
1320 ms
image
1395 ms
image
1572 ms
image
1431 ms
image
2460 ms
image
2390 ms
image
1748 ms
image
1808 ms
image
1862 ms
image
1948 ms
image
2023 ms
image
2015 ms
image
2003 ms
image
2087 ms
image
2112 ms
image
2088 ms
image
2158 ms
image
2245 ms
image
2110 ms
image
2105 ms
image
2088 ms
image
2189 ms
image
2177 ms
image
2112 ms
image
2115 ms
image
2127 ms
image
2108 ms
image
2115 ms
image
2237 ms
image
2244 ms
image
2066 ms
image
2052 ms
image
2068 ms
image
2032 ms
image
2049 ms
image
1945 ms
image
1952 ms
image
1799 ms
image
1716 ms
image
1417 ms
image
1345 ms
image
1299 ms
image
1238 ms
image
1177 ms
image
1173 ms
image
1131 ms
image
1013 ms
image
1030 ms
image
1053 ms
image
1070 ms
price_sqm.svg
1015 ms
image
1010 ms
image
1004 ms
image
997 ms
image
1004 ms
image
1001 ms
image
939 ms
bestchoice.bg accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bestchoice.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bestchoice.bg SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestchoice.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestchoice.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestchoice.bg
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Choice. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: