Tools & Wizards About Us
bestchoicerenovation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

bestchoicerenovation.com

Roofing Company Chicago Area | Roofing Contractors & Roof Repair Chicago Area

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

959 ms

Page Rendered

4.7 sec

bestchoicerenovation.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestchoicerenovation.com homepage info - get ready to check Bestchoicerenovation best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestchoicerenovation.com

Best Choice Roofing Company, Chicago Area ✅ Roofing Installation ✅Roof Repair ✅Roof Replacement ✅ Commercial Roofing

Visit bestchoicerenovation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestchoicerenovation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestchoicerenovation.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.283

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestchoicerenovation.com

84 ms

css

35 ms

bootstrap.css

91 ms

animate.css

59 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Bestchoicerenovation.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (540 ms) relates to the external source Gzexterior.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.4 kB (1%)

Content Size

34.1 MB

After Optimization

33.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestchoicerenovation.com main page is 34.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 33.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 34.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.7 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 112.5 kB

  • Original 33.6 MB
  • After minification 33.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestchoicerenovation images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 314.7 kB
  • After minification 314.7 kB
  • After compression 291.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 85.7 kB
  • After compression 68.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestchoicerenovation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestchoicerenovation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestchoicerenovation.com

bestchoicerenovation.com

84 ms

css

css

35 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

91 ms

animate.css

animate.css

59 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

44 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.css

bootstrap-datepicker.css

45 ms

jquery.timepicker.css

jquery.timepicker.css

46 ms

ionicons.min.css

ionicons.min.css

73 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

78 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

62 ms

style3.css

style3.css

80 ms

js

js

76 ms

api.js

api.js

61 ms

js

js

251 ms

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

jquery-3.2.1.min.js

121 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

120 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

118 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

118 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

119 ms

main.js

main.js

120 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

186 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

235 ms

hauzz-320x142.png

hauzz-320x142.png

442 ms

google-my-business-chattanooga-marketing-company.jpg

google-my-business-chattanooga-marketing-company.jpg

497 ms

houzz-ikonanew.png

houzz-ikonanew.png

201 ms

google-1.png

google-1.png

201 ms

yelp.png

yelp.png

201 ms

logo.png

logo.png

201 ms

img_sekcja1.jpeg

img_sekcja1.jpeg

212 ms

check.png

check.png

211 ms

roofinspection.jpeg

roofinspection.jpeg

358 ms

roofrepair.jpeg

roofrepair.jpeg

386 ms

roofreplacement.jpeg

roofreplacement.jpeg

362 ms

roofinstallation.jpeg

roofinstallation.jpeg

351 ms

commercial.jpeg

commercial.jpeg

308 ms

rsz_residential.jpg

rsz_residential.jpg

306 ms

medal.png

medal.png

308 ms

maintenance.png

maintenance.png

347 ms

coins.png

coins.png

347 ms

support.png

support.png

363 ms

estimate.png

estimate.png

366 ms

2-7.jpg

2-7.jpg

369 ms

testimoniale.jpg

testimoniale.jpg

374 ms

roofing-home1.jpg

roofing-home1.jpg

370 ms

GAF_Cert_V1.jpg

GAF_Cert_V1.jpg

365 ms

GAF_Sys_V1.jpg

GAF_Sys_V1.jpg

367 ms

pin.png

pin.png

375 ms

phone.png

phone.png

379 ms

yelp-logo-transparent-background-4-e1554195417285-320x124.png

yelp-logo-transparent-background-4-e1554195417285-320x124.png

540 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

194 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

199 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

281 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

282 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

244 ms

2-1.jpg

2-1.jpg

253 ms

3-1.jpg

3-1.jpg

254 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

153 ms

js

js

70 ms

js

js

153 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

286 ms

anchor

anchor

86 ms

collect

collect

90 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

13 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js

sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js

46 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

43 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

33 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

7 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

44 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

43 ms

google-my-business-chattanooga-marketing-company.jpg

google-my-business-chattanooga-marketing-company.jpg

282 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

46 ms

Accessibility Review

bestchoicerenovation.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bestchoicerenovation.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestchoicerenovation.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestchoicerenovation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestchoicerenovation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestchoicerenovation.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestchoicerenovation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: