Tools & Wizards About Us
bestclippingpath.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bestclippingpath.com

Clipping Path Service Provider Company - Best Clipping Path (BCP) | Home

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

394 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

bestclippingpath.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bestclippingpath.com now to see the best up-to-date Best Clipping Path content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestclippingpath.com

Highly skilled design team offering the best photoshop services such as clipping, masking, retouching, restoration, conversion and manipulation of images at affordable price. Call +8802-9635152 to com...

Visit bestclippingpath.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestclippingpath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 394 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestclippingpath.com performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,400 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.383

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestclippingpath.com

394 ms

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

all.min.css

42 ms

animate.min.css

56 ms

custom.css

1475 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Bestclippingpath.com, 40% (23 requests) were made to Creativeclippingpath.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Creativeclippingpath.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.6 kB (41%)

Content Size

482.9 kB

After Optimization

287.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestclippingpath.com main page is 482.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 200.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 178.4 kB

  • Original 200.7 kB
  • After minification 112.9 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 87.8 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Clipping Path needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 194.6 kB
  • After minification 194.6 kB
  • After compression 183.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 73.6 kB
  • After minification 73.6 kB
  • After compression 68.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestclippingpath.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Clipping Path. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestclippingpath.com

bestclippingpath.com

394 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

42 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

56 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1475 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

1288 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

1309 ms

YMCN-RNHulw

YMCN-RNHulw

108 ms

bestclippingpath.com

bestclippingpath.com

479 ms

drop-second.png

drop-second.png

1334 ms

drop-third.png

drop-third.png

1341 ms

drop-first.png

drop-first.png

1371 ms

drop-four.png

drop-four.png

1478 ms

drop-five.png

drop-five.png

1579 ms

drop-six.png

drop-six.png

1580 ms

drop-seven.png

drop-seven.png

1580 ms

drop-eight.png

drop-eight.png

1629 ms

ccp-3.webp

ccp-3.webp

1875 ms

ccp-2.webp

ccp-2.webp

2075 ms

ccp-1.webp

ccp-1.webp

2110 ms

ccp-4.webp

ccp-4.webp

2152 ms

headphoneSmall.webp

headphoneSmall.webp

1968 ms

profile.png

profile.png

392 ms

profile-2.png

profile-2.png

393 ms

profile-3.png

profile-3.png

391 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

20 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

13 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

71 ms

jqueryPreLoaded.min.js

jqueryPreLoaded.min.js

1761 ms

website_loader.min.js

website_loader.min.js

1982 ms

3d.min.js

3d.min.js

1978 ms

ccpl-custom.js

ccpl-custom.js

2093 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2181 ms

js

js

253 ms

before-after.js

before-after.js

2206 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

31 ms

base.js

base.js

59 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

176 ms

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

105 ms

embed.js

embed.js

34 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

132 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

131 ms

id

id

23 ms

Create

Create

108 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

11 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

arrow-before.png

arrow-before.png

776 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

49 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

63 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

66 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

64 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

61 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

64 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

120 ms

bestclippingpath.com

bestclippingpath.com

210 ms

Accessibility Review

bestclippingpath.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bestclippingpath.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestclippingpath.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestclippingpath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestclippingpath.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestclippingpath.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Clipping Path. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: