Tools & Wizards About Us
bestdesigninfotech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

bestdesigninfotech.com

Web Design & Development Company | Best Design Infotech

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

565 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

655 ms

bestdesigninfotech.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bestdesigninfotech.com now to see the best up-to-date Best Design Infotech content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestdesigninfotech.com

Best Design Infotech offers the best services and training on various digital marketing modules like Web design and development, SEO, SMO, PPC by experts.

Visit bestdesigninfotech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestdesigninfotech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 565 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestdesigninfotech.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestdesigninfotech.com

565 ms

bootstrap.min.css

271 ms

animate.css

495 ms

owl.carousel.css

492 ms

font-awesome.css

497 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Bestdesigninfotech.com, 22% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestdesigninfotech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestdesigninfotech.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 84.2 kB

  • Original 91.4 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.8 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Design Infotech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 221.4 kB
  • After minification 220.3 kB
  • After compression 209.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 87.0 kB
  • After compression 77.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestdesigninfotech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Design Infotech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestdesigninfotech.com

bestdesigninfotech.com

565 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

271 ms

animate.css

animate.css

495 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

492 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

497 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

506 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

505 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

43 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

526 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

753 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

743 ms

main.css

main.css

748 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

760 ms

js

js

73 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

761 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

779 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

999 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

1004 ms

jquery-waypoints.js

jquery-waypoints.js

1005 ms

jquery-validate.js

jquery-validate.js

1023 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1024 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1055 ms

numinate.min6959.js

numinate.min6959.js

1238 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

1237 ms

main.js

main.js

1242 ms

revolution.tools.min.js

revolution.tools.min.js

1408 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1540 ms

slider.js

slider.js

1409 ms

snippet.js

snippet.js

44 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

47 ms

pre-loader-1.gif

pre-loader-1.gif

664 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

1148 ms

slider-2.jpg

slider-2.jpg

1390 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

1212 ms

row-bgimage-3.png

row-bgimage-3.png

772 ms

col-bgimage-1.jpg

col-bgimage-1.jpg

1391 ms

process-arrow.png

process-arrow.png

973 ms

row-bgimage-5.jpg

row-bgimage-5.jpg

1242 ms

row-bgimage-1.jpg

row-bgimage-1.jpg

1463 ms

row-bgimage-2.jpg

row-bgimage-2.jpg

1394 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

64 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

82 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

85 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

83 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

84 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

34 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

1302 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1596 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1472 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtF.ttf

83 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hVF9eL.ttf

84 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21lVF9eL.ttf

86 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19VF9eL.ttf

85 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15VF9eL.ttf

87 ms

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf

nuFRD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXDTnCjmHKM4nYO7KN_qiTXtHA_A.ttf

87 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

87 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

87 ms

themify9f24.woff

themify9f24.woff

1492 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1085 ms

Accessibility Review

bestdesigninfotech.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestdesigninfotech.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bestdesigninfotech.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestdesigninfotech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestdesigninfotech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestdesigninfotech.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Design Infotech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: