Tools & Wizards About Us
bestepak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bestepak.com

Air Cushion Machine, Air Pillow Machine, Air Cushion Film, Air Cushion Packaging Machine, Air Cushion Bubble Film, Air Bubble Film, Mini Pakr, Sealed ...

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

308 ms

bestepak.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestepak.com homepage info - get ready to check Bestepak best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestepak.com

Here is Xinchen Packing Equipment which produces Air Cushion Machine, Air Cushion Film, Air Pillow Film, Air Pillow Machine, Air Bubble Machine.

Visit bestepak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestepak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestepak.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.892

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestepak.com

94 ms

www.bestepak.com

161 ms

main.css

71 ms

jquery.js

139 ms

jquery.jqzoom.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Bestepak.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (286 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestepak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 29.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestepak.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 33.1 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 642 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestepak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 180 B

  • Original 72.3 kB
  • After minification 72.3 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 14.8 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestepak.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (37%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestepak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestepak.com

bestepak.com

94 ms

www.bestepak.com

www.bestepak.com

161 ms

main.css

main.css

71 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

139 ms

jquery.jqzoom.js

jquery.jqzoom.js

100 ms

js

js

86 ms

placeholder.js

placeholder.js

98 ms

resize.js

resize.js

97 ms

baguetteBox.js

baguetteBox.js

99 ms

slide.js

slide.js

109 ms

banner.js

banner.js

128 ms

sm.js

sm.js

130 ms

flqiehuan.js

flqiehuan.js

130 ms

qiehuan.js

qiehuan.js

129 ms

base.js

base.js

182 ms

form1.js

form1.js

183 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

logo.png

logo.png

42 ms

5dbaacdf08b02.jpg

5dbaacdf08b02.jpg

135 ms

5dbaad07d4947.jpg

5dbaad07d4947.jpg

172 ms

5dbaad1d75567.jpg

5dbaad1d75567.jpg

172 ms

653c56e3734c9.jpg

653c56e3734c9.jpg

193 ms

syp.jpg

syp.jpg

73 ms

syp1.jpg

syp1.jpg

134 ms

syabg.jpg

syabg.jpg

135 ms

sya.jpg

sya.jpg

137 ms

wechat.svg

wechat.svg

137 ms

ewm.png

ewm.png

204 ms

whatsapp.svg

whatsapp.svg

170 ms

skype.svg

skype.svg

171 ms

mail.svg

mail.svg

185 ms

index.php

index.php

286 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

193 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

198 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

217 ms

pinterest.svg

pinterest.svg

224 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

226 ms

reanod.png

reanod.png

229 ms

js

js

102 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

34 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

101 ms

ariblk.woff

ariblk.woff

128 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

36 ms

Accessibility Review

bestepak.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestepak.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bestepak.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestepak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestepak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestepak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestepak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: