Tools & Wizards About Us
besteq.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

besteq.ru

ООО БЕСТЕК-Инжиниринг - промышленное пищевое оборудование

Page Load Speed

22.9 sec in total

First Response

789 ms

Resources Loaded

21.7 sec

Page Rendered

414 ms

besteq.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit besteq.ru now to see the best up-to-date Besteq content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about besteq.ru

Мы - производители и поставщики промышленного пищевого оборудования. Разработка линий, оборудование на заказ.

Visit besteq.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Besteq.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 789 ms and then it took 22.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

besteq.ru performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,120 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

besteq.ru

789 ms

bootstrap2.css

670 ms

style.css

384 ms

jquery1.fancybox.css

533 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Besteq.ru, 4% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 352.9 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

910.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Besteq.ru main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 882.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 56.9 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 93.7 kB

  • Original 882.0 kB
  • After minification 788.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Besteq needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 83.9 kB

  • Original 171.9 kB
  • After minification 152.8 kB
  • After compression 88.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 118.4 kB

  • Original 138.0 kB
  • After minification 111.6 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Besteq.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (25%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Besteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

besteq.ru

besteq.ru

789 ms

bootstrap2.css

bootstrap2.css

670 ms

style.css

style.css

384 ms

jquery1.fancybox.css

jquery1.fancybox.css

533 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

386 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

403 ms

jquery.scrollTo-min.js

jquery.scrollTo-min.js

525 ms

jquery.nyroModal.custom.js

jquery.nyroModal.custom.js

922 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

380 ms

watch.js

watch.js

345 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

789 ms

bghead.png

bghead.png

259 ms

bg2iner.jpg

bg2iner.jpg

390 ms

logo.png

logo.png

514 ms

headtxt.png

headtxt.png

403 ms

input.png

input.png

271 ms

0.gif

0.gif

511 ms

bnaddnews.png

bnaddnews.png

540 ms

bgnavbut.jpg

bgnavbut.jpg

641 ms

bgmaincont.png

bgmaincont.png

657 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

765 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1165 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1051 ms

33.jpg

33.jpg

1162 ms

44.jpg

44.jpg

1078 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1176 ms

g1.jpg

g1.jpg

1041 ms

g2.jpg

g2.jpg

1338 ms

g3.jpg

g3.jpg

1339 ms

g4.jpg

g4.jpg

1341 ms

g5.jpg

g5.jpg

1427 ms

g6.jpg

g6.jpg

1432 ms

g7.jpg

g7.jpg

1460 ms

g8.jpg

g8.jpg

1600 ms

g9.jpg

g9.jpg

1745 ms

g10.jpg

g10.jpg

1746 ms

g11.jpg

g11.jpg

1687 ms

g13.jpg

g13.jpg

1695 ms

g15.jpg

g15.jpg

1720 ms

g14.jpg

g14.jpg

1872 ms

g12.jpg

g12.jpg

1975 ms

g16.jpg

g16.jpg

1976 ms

g17.jpg

g17.jpg

2130 ms

bntop.png

bntop.png

2002 ms

bnfrend.png

bnfrend.png

2017 ms

bgbutn.png

bgbutn.png

2123 ms

pluso-like.js

pluso-like.js

268 ms

hit

hit

262 ms

top100.scn

top100.scn

128 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

20119 ms

569880

569880

20116 ms

ga.js

ga.js

18 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

5 ms

bgbutvn.png

bgbutvn.png

2004 ms

nav1.png

nav1.png

1998 ms

hit

hit

131 ms

navsubm.png

navsubm.png

1892 ms

nav2.png

nav2.png

1877 ms

nav3.png

nav3.png

1889 ms

nav4.png

nav4.png

1894 ms

nav8.png

nav8.png

1978 ms

nav7.png

nav7.png

1903 ms

nav6.png

nav6.png

1878 ms

nav10.png

nav10.png

1781 ms

nav9.png

nav9.png

1882 ms

nav5.png

nav5.png

1629 ms

nav11.png

nav11.png

1742 ms

nav20.png

nav20.png

1723 ms

nav16.png

nav16.png

1639 ms

nav17.png

nav17.png

1648 ms

nav14.png

nav14.png

1751 ms

nav21.png

nav21.png

1587 ms

nav22.png

nav22.png

1717 ms

bgimggnd.png

bgimggnd.png

1725 ms

bgtxtblock.png

bgtxtblock.png

1638 ms

ficon.png

ficon.png

1648 ms

bgfooter.png

bgfooter.png

1727 ms

Accessibility Review

besteq.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

besteq.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

besteq.ru SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Besteq.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Besteq.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

besteq.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Besteq. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: