Tools & Wizards About Us
bestimageclipping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

bestimageclipping.com

Professional Product Photo Editing Service | Image Editing Company

Page Load Speed

21.5 sec in total

First Response

214 ms

Resources Loaded

20.5 sec

Page Rendered

816 ms

bestimageclipping.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bestimageclipping.com now to see the best up-to-date Best Image Clipping content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestimageclipping.com

Best image clipping is one of the professional product photo editing service provider in USA, UK & Germany. We are top rated and advance image editing company and accept all kind outsourcing bulk phot...

Visit bestimageclipping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestimageclipping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 21.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

bestimageclipping.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestimageclipping.com

214 ms

hmq4cvq.css

142 ms

bootstrap.min.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

72 ms

slick.css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Bestimageclipping.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.1 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

916.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestimageclipping.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 955.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 30.7 kB

  • Original 36.5 kB
  • After minification 25.1 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 108.7 kB

  • Original 955.6 kB
  • After minification 846.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Image Clipping needs image optimization as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 44.5 kB
  • After compression 42.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 37.5 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestimageclipping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (34%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Image Clipping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestimageclipping.com

bestimageclipping.com

214 ms

hmq4cvq.css

hmq4cvq.css

142 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

72 ms

slick.css

slick.css

87 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

89 ms

style.css

style.css

24 ms

css

css

74 ms

BeerSlider.css

BeerSlider.css

46 ms

js

js

102 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

64 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

86 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

57 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

85 ms

BeerSlider.js

BeerSlider.js

221 ms

main.js

main.js

218 ms

p.css

p.css

27 ms

logo.png

logo.png

71 ms

best-banner.jpg

best-banner.jpg

173 ms

A2_1_C.jpg

A2_1_C.jpg

22 ms

B2_1_C.jpg

B2_1_C.jpg

22 ms

B3_2.jpg

B3_2.jpg

22 ms

A3_1.jpg

A3_1.jpg

171 ms

B4_2.jpg

B4_2.jpg

25 ms

A4_1.jpg

A4_1.jpg

172 ms

our-after.jpg

our-after.jpg

172 ms

our-befour.jpg

our-befour.jpg

288 ms

imac.png

imac.png

187 ms

feature-icon40e50580913af76d9602d9d346d10280.png

feature-icon40e50580913af76d9602d9d346d10280.png

208 ms

retouch_banner.gif

retouch_banner.gif

210 ms

imac.jpg

imac.jpg

209 ms

logo_1.jpg

logo_1.jpg

208 ms

logo_3.jpg

logo_3.jpg

207 ms

logo_12.jpg

logo_12.jpg

229 ms

logo_14.jpg

logo_14.jpg

229 ms

logo_5.jpg

logo_5.jpg

230 ms

logo_6.jpg

logo_6.jpg

209 ms

logo_7.jpg

logo_7.jpg

210 ms

logo.png

logo.png

231 ms

multiply.png

multiply.png

169 ms

camera.png

camera.png

168 ms

money-bag.png

money-bag.png

168 ms

time-machine.png

time-machine.png

168 ms

the-flash-sign.png

the-flash-sign.png

168 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

170 ms

default

default

20036 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrcVIT9d4cw.woff

24 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

45 ms

Accessibility Review

bestimageclipping.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

bestimageclipping.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestimageclipping.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestimageclipping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestimageclipping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestimageclipping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Image Clipping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: