Tools & Wizards About Us
bestkitap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bestkitap.com

Best Publishing - Best Kitabevi - English Books - English Learning Books

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

420 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

130 ms

bestkitap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Best Kitap content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestkitap.com

The BEST way to Learn or Teach a foreign language with the leader in Language Learning Education, BEST PUBLISHING COMPANY.

Visit bestkitap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestkitap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestkitap.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.055

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestkitap.com

420 ms

css

50 ms

autoptimize_single_f7510c766a41dab7c34224f0f541bd14.css

88 ms

autoptimize_single_896110e2c38585eea2bc7ff18e6e8b83.css

352 ms

autoptimize_single_6a299161d080d551b9c3d0c245ebcb16.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Bestkitap.com, 32% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (652 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestkitap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 829.0 kB (66%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

432.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Bestkitap.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 978.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 815.4 kB

  • Original 978.6 kB
  • After minification 978.4 kB
  • After compression 163.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 815.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 67.6 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Kitap needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 215.1 kB
  • After minification 215.1 kB
  • After compression 213.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (57%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Kitap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestkitap.com

bestkitap.com

420 ms

css

css

50 ms

autoptimize_single_f7510c766a41dab7c34224f0f541bd14.css

autoptimize_single_f7510c766a41dab7c34224f0f541bd14.css

88 ms

autoptimize_single_896110e2c38585eea2bc7ff18e6e8b83.css

autoptimize_single_896110e2c38585eea2bc7ff18e6e8b83.css

352 ms

autoptimize_single_6a299161d080d551b9c3d0c245ebcb16.css

autoptimize_single_6a299161d080d551b9c3d0c245ebcb16.css

200 ms

autoptimize_single_d84919dac2ee2c03a328395f115c5cb7.css

autoptimize_single_d84919dac2ee2c03a328395f115c5cb7.css

343 ms

autoptimize_single_2337ecd31ed37324d7eba3d51662ddf8.css

autoptimize_single_2337ecd31ed37324d7eba3d51662ddf8.css

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

349 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

180 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

346 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

269 ms

autoptimize_ef160fc8b74eb9041349ec5cc6e82c8b.js

autoptimize_ef160fc8b74eb9041349ec5cc6e82c8b.js

652 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

134 ms

en.png

en.png

102 ms

tr.png

tr.png

255 ms

BestPublishing-Logo-e1598185801984.png

BestPublishing-Logo-e1598185801984.png

103 ms

BestPublishing-Logo-1200x436-1-e1596306221301.png

BestPublishing-Logo-1200x436-1-e1596306221301.png

103 ms

ajax-loader@2x.gif

ajax-loader@2x.gif

181 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

104 ms

Asset-1.png

Asset-1.png

209 ms

logo-band@3x.png

logo-band@3x.png

415 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

55 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

106 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

107 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

107 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

107 ms

porto.woff

porto.woff

313 ms

OZpGg_pnoDtINPfRIlLohlvHxA.ttf

OZpGg_pnoDtINPfRIlLohlvHxA.ttf

108 ms

1Ptgg87LROyAm3Kz-Co.ttf

1Ptgg87LROyAm3Kz-Co.ttf

106 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

108 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

108 ms

css

css

73 ms

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

93 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

93 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

92 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

150 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

152 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

150 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

bestkitap.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bestkitap.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bestkitap.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestkitap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestkitap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestkitap.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Kitap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: