Tools & Wizards About Us
bestlifebrands.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

bestlifebrands.com

Homecare, Senior Placement, Estate Sale Franchises | Best Life Brands

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

519 ms

bestlifebrands.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestlifebrands.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Life Brands best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bestlifebrands.com

Best Life Brands companies focus on client wellbeing at any stage of life, including Homecare, Senior placement, and Estate Sale companies.

Visit bestlifebrands.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestlifebrands.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestlifebrands.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.484

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestlifebrands.com

238 ms

css

107 ms

main.css

91 ms

awsstatreporter.com

68 ms

js

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Bestlifebrands.com, 23% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (586 ms) relates to the external source Zyrachat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 287.6 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

734.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestlifebrands.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 600.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 26.1 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 600.1 kB
  • After minification 570.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Life Brands images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 156.7 kB

  • Original 283.5 kB
  • After minification 283.5 kB
  • After compression 126.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.7 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 106.6 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestlifebrands.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Life Brands. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestlifebrands.com

bestlifebrands.com

238 ms

css

css

107 ms

main.css

main.css

91 ms

awsstatreporter.com

awsstatreporter.com

68 ms

js

js

85 ms

swap.js

swap.js

72 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

71 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

269 ms

2ABWViG

2ABWViG

74 ms

botdistribution.min.js

botdistribution.min.js

586 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

167 ms

hotjar-1704125.js

hotjar-1704125.js

323 ms

bat.js

bat.js

330 ms

logo.png

logo.png

264 ms

banner-bg.jpg

banner-bg.jpg

263 ms

logo-translucent.svg

logo-translucent.svg

299 ms

content-home-franchising.png

content-home-franchising.png

406 ms

content-home-franchising-bg.jpg

content-home-franchising-bg.jpg

405 ms

image-list.svg

image-list.svg

293 ms

content-image-locations.png

content-image-locations.png

404 ms

content-home-image-woman.png

content-home-image-woman.png

406 ms

logo-hcaoa.png

logo-hcaoa.png

406 ms

logo-vet-fran.png

logo-vet-fran.png

430 ms

logo-cfa.png

logo-cfa.png

436 ms

logo-achc.png

logo-achc.png

436 ms

logo-ifa.png

logo-ifa.png

436 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

356 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

409 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

409 ms

220 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

203 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

202 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

202 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf

202 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf

263 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

264 ms

js

js

81 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

203 ms

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

57 ms

132 ms

Accessibility Review

bestlifebrands.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestlifebrands.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestlifebrands.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestlifebrands.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bestlifebrands.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestlifebrands.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Life Brands. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: