Tools & Wizards About Us
bestmail.ws screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

bestmail.ws

bestmail.ws - Get a real mail !

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

375 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

177 ms

bestmail.ws screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Best Mail content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestmail.ws

Webhosting, Mail Account, Mail Forwarder, IRC-Bouncer, VPN, SSH-Tunnel, Backup-FTP

Visit bestmail.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestmail.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestmail.ws performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestmail.ws

375 ms

bestmail.ws

417 ms

www.bestmail.ws

370 ms

www.bestmail.ws

416 ms

style.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bestmail.ws and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (611 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestmail.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

249.8 kB

After Optimization

208.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestmail.ws main page is 249.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 190.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 190.0 kB
  • After minification 164.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Mail needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 39.4 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 37.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestmail.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (28%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Mail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestmail.ws

bestmail.ws

375 ms

bestmail.ws

bestmail.ws

417 ms

www.bestmail.ws

www.bestmail.ws

370 ms

www.bestmail.ws

www.bestmail.ws

416 ms

style.css

style.css

106 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

209 ms

jquery-1.6.4.min.js

jquery-1.6.4.min.js

402 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

300 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

301 ms

supersubs.js

supersubs.js

301 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

311 ms

bg-body.gif

bg-body.gif

104 ms

light.png

light.png

105 ms

logo.png

logo.png

105 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

105 ms

bg-nav.png

bg-nav.png

104 ms

bg-dropdown.png

bg-dropdown.png

103 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

177 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

399 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

303 ms

bg-package.png

bg-package.png

206 ms

icon-check.png

icon-check.png

205 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

211 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

279 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

310 ms

icon4.png

icon4.png

309 ms

icon5.png

icon5.png

319 ms

icon6.png

icon6.png

383 ms

icon-logo1.png

icon-logo1.png

405 ms

icon-logo2.png

icon-logo2.png

412 ms

icon-logo3.png

icon-logo3.png

412 ms

icon-logo4.png

icon-logo4.png

426 ms

icon-logo5.png

icon-logo5.png

485 ms

icon-logo6.png

icon-logo6.png

500 ms

arrow-footer.gif

arrow-footer.gif

505 ms

line-footer.gif

line-footer.gif

513 ms

DroidSans-webfont.woff

DroidSans-webfont.woff

611 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

104 ms

Accessibility Review

bestmail.ws accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bestmail.ws best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bestmail.ws SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestmail.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bestmail.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestmail.ws

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Mail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: