Tools & Wizards About Us
bestmarg.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

bestmarg.org

Bestmarg Infotech | Best ERP Solution Services in India

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

883 ms

Page Rendered

749 ms

bestmarg.org screenshot

About Website

Visit bestmarg.org now to see the best up-to-date Bestmarg content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestmarg.org

Bestmarg Infotech was started with the aim of helping customers and business to save their rising IT cost without impacting the quality.

Visit bestmarg.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestmarg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestmarg.org performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.658

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestmarg.org

134 ms

theme-styles.min.css

69 ms

blocks.min.css

48 ms

widgets.min.css

35 ms

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Bestmarg.org, 5% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (313 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestmarg.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 942.1 kB (41%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestmarg.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 126.0 kB

  • Original 154.5 kB
  • After minification 121.0 kB
  • After compression 28.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestmarg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 497.3 kB

  • Original 732.7 kB
  • After minification 717.1 kB
  • After compression 235.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 497.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 298.4 kB

  • Original 367.7 kB
  • After minification 367.0 kB
  • After compression 69.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestmarg.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (38%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

55

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestmarg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestmarg.org

bestmarg.org

134 ms

theme-styles.min.css

theme-styles.min.css

69 ms

blocks.min.css

blocks.min.css

48 ms

widgets.min.css

widgets.min.css

35 ms

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

ion.rangeSlider.min.css

34 ms

css

css

58 ms

css

css

77 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

54 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

38 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

241 ms

js

js

279 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

18 ms

ajax-pagination.min.js

ajax-pagination.min.js

13 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

13 ms

timer.min.js

timer.min.js

13 ms

crum-mega-menu.min.js

crum-mega-menu.min.js

24 ms

swiper.jquery.min.js

swiper.jquery.min.js

185 ms

jquery.typeahead.min.js

jquery.typeahead.min.js

180 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

180 ms

form-actions.min.js

form-actions.min.js

25 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

179 ms

jquery-countTo.min.js

jquery-countTo.min.js

178 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

180 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

182 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

182 ms

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

183 ms

Headroom.min.js

Headroom.min.js

183 ms

smooth-scroll.min.js

smooth-scroll.min.js

197 ms

segment.min.js

segment.min.js

236 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

236 ms

moment.min.js

moment.min.js

236 ms

moment-timezone.min.js

moment-timezone.min.js

313 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

234 ms

ion.rangeSlider.js

ion.rangeSlider.js

236 ms

parsley.min.js

parsley.min.js

266 ms

main.js

main.js

266 ms

bot.js

bot.js

277 ms

js

js

237 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

228 ms

logo.png

logo.png

91 ms

product-item1.jpg

product-item1.jpg

90 ms

product-item2.jpg

product-item2.jpg

89 ms

product-item3.jpg

product-item3.jpg

135 ms

product-item4.jpg

product-item4.jpg

136 ms

clouds1.png

clouds1.png

136 ms

slides1.png

slides1.png

146 ms

clouds2.png

clouds2.png

135 ms

google-play.svg

google-play.svg

147 ms

clouds3.png

clouds3.png

147 ms

slides2.png

slides2.png

150 ms

cloud-computing%20(1).svg

cloud-computing%20(1).svg

149 ms

clouds8.png

clouds8.png

150 ms

smartphone.svg

smartphone.svg

150 ms

clouds9.png

clouds9.png

293 ms

settings%20(4).svg

settings%20(4).svg

293 ms

clouds10.png

clouds10.png

294 ms

clouds5.png

clouds5.png

293 ms

iphone.png

iphone.png

293 ms

clouds6.png

clouds6.png

293 ms

iphone2.png

iphone2.png

295 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTQ3iQ.woff

147 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTQ3iQ.woff

289 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTQ3iQ.woff

292 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTQ3iQ.woff

292 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

96 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

132 ms

8AttGsyxM5KQQU-Y4MTwVanUqRw.woff

8AttGsyxM5KQQU-Y4MTwVanUqRw.woff

301 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

142 ms

clouds7.png

clouds7.png

293 ms

iphone3.png

iphone3.png

294 ms

clouds11.png

clouds11.png

291 ms

video-thumb.png

video-thumb.png

292 ms

play.png

play.png

278 ms

clouds12.png

clouds12.png

278 ms

c1.png

c1.png

278 ms

c2.jpg

c2.jpg

240 ms

c3.jpg

c3.jpg

240 ms

C4.jpg

C4.jpg

240 ms

c5.png

c5.png

240 ms

c6.png

c6.png

240 ms

clouds13.png

clouds13.png

212 ms

chat.svg

chat.svg

213 ms

pictures.svg

pictures.svg

212 ms

image.png

image.png

214 ms

clock.svg

clock.svg

214 ms

calendar.svg

calendar.svg

172 ms

clouds14.png

clouds14.png

172 ms

faqs-cloud.png

faqs-cloud.png

171 ms

dial.svg

dial.svg

171 ms

tap.svg

tap.svg

163 ms

clouds15.png

clouds15.png

163 ms

img-slide1.png

img-slide1.png

163 ms

img-slide2.png

img-slide2.png

161 ms

img-slide3.png

img-slide3.png

161 ms

clouds4.png

clouds4.png

161 ms

author2.png

author2.png

160 ms

clouds18.png

clouds18.png

112 ms

subscribe-img.png

subscribe-img.png

143 ms

clouds16.png

clouds16.png

143 ms

clouds.png

clouds.png

143 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

9 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

9 ms

Accessibility Review

bestmarg.org accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestmarg.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestmarg.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestmarg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestmarg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestmarg.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestmarg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: