Access bestmark.ma. Bestmark - Connectons-nous! Pc portable, Smarpthone, Apple ...

bestmark.ma screenshot

69

Performance

Renders faster than
80% of other websites
100

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 97% of websites
67

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
24% of websites
92

SEO

Google-friendlier than
74% of websites

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

833 ms

bestmark.ma screenshot

About Website

Visit bestmark.ma now to see the best up-to-date Bestmark content for Morocco and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestmark.ma

Achat en ligne Bestmark.ma · meilleur prix du marché · paiement à la livraison · retrait partout au Maroc.

Visit bestmark.ma

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestmark.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.459

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

bestmark.ma

239 ms

bestmark.ma

320 ms

calendar.min.css

170 ms

styles-m.min.css

224 ms

uppy-custom.min.css

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 159 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (156 requests) were addressed to the original Bestmark.ma, 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestmark.ma.

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Bestmark.ma main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 423.2 kB

Original 465.6 kB
After minification 463.3 kB
After compression 42.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 423.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

Original 2.2 MB
After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 177.6 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 867.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 177.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 42.1 kB

Original 174.4 kB
After minification 174.4 kB
After compression 132.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestmark.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

156

After Optimization

46

The browser has sent 156 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

FR
Language Claimed

FR
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestmark.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestmark.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestmark.ma

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: