Tools & Wizards About Us
bestpetinsurance.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

bestpetinsurance.com

Home

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

124 ms

bestpetinsurance.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestpetinsurance.com homepage info - get ready to check Bestpetinsurance best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestpetinsurance.com

Visit bestpetinsurance.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestpetinsurance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestpetinsurance.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestpetinsurance.com

12 ms

bestpetinsurance.com

770 ms

14042b8eb3edb8fc4eae.css

14 ms

ffff1044d9b38f8de4a3.css

17 ms

61b285420ddc88fcf413.css

375 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Bestpetinsurance.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Resizer.valuetrackbi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (770 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestpetinsurance.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

309.3 kB

After Optimization

254.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestpetinsurance.com main page is 309.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 232.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.0 kB

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 941 B

  • Original 232.4 kB
  • After minification 232.4 kB
  • After compression 231.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 144 B

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestpetinsurance.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (89%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestpetinsurance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestpetinsurance.com

bestpetinsurance.com

12 ms

bestpetinsurance.com

bestpetinsurance.com

770 ms

14042b8eb3edb8fc4eae.css

14042b8eb3edb8fc4eae.css

14 ms

ffff1044d9b38f8de4a3.css

ffff1044d9b38f8de4a3.css

17 ms

61b285420ddc88fcf413.css

61b285420ddc88fcf413.css

375 ms

5e2d0315d8b12f47e377.css

5e2d0315d8b12f47e377.css

40 ms

55b557393d16fc3f338e.css

55b557393d16fc3f338e.css

41 ms

3eb863af6f76b41b7824.css

3eb863af6f76b41b7824.css

19 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

20 ms

24050.9e13b9b933f7fba55e7c.js

24050.9e13b9b933f7fba55e7c.js

41 ms

63568.af27fd96f4e8a13ebcce.js

63568.af27fd96f4e8a13ebcce.js

41 ms

25675.7ffbd0ebafd0deeb318e.js

25675.7ffbd0ebafd0deeb318e.js

45 ms

50353.090d8f8d055873c3b828.js

50353.090d8f8d055873c3b828.js

40 ms

43591.c0b89e479671f6ffbe98.js

43591.c0b89e479671f6ffbe98.js

45 ms

17213.66142da8a575a2d4a1b7.js

17213.66142da8a575a2d4a1b7.js

47 ms

7478.12c85e40b0ed67c7cf22.js

7478.12c85e40b0ed67c7cf22.js

47 ms

21847.05ca419b3fdaf79d9df3.js

21847.05ca419b3fdaf79d9df3.js

45 ms

24876.1125720eb8c1f6fa7698.js

24876.1125720eb8c1f6fa7698.js

48 ms

77206.3a2fb45e173950aff3af.js

77206.3a2fb45e173950aff3af.js

48 ms

45821.d2c673c99c33e94019b7.js

45821.d2c673c99c33e94019b7.js

48 ms

9459.dec53db37f5836d3d724.js

9459.dec53db37f5836d3d724.js

50 ms

webpack-04dda796f99f5d607351.js

webpack-04dda796f99f5d607351.js

50 ms

framework-be29662deca1f3dec1cc.js

framework-be29662deca1f3dec1cc.js

55 ms

main-9147ff2b6695f396a502.js

main-9147ff2b6695f396a502.js

54 ms

_app-b2db442e875f0638cee2.js

_app-b2db442e875f0638cee2.js

54 ms

%5B...path%5D-974d5ff481b21165c6b0.js

%5B...path%5D-974d5ff481b21165c6b0.js

79 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

87 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

87 ms

fit-in

fit-in

84 ms

Accessibility Review

bestpetinsurance.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestpetinsurance.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bestpetinsurance.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestpetinsurance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bestpetinsurance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestpetinsurance.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestpetinsurance. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: