Tools & Wizards About Us
bestpolesaw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

bestpolesaw.com

Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

643 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

3.1 sec

bestpolesaw.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bestpolesaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Bestpolesaw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestpolesaw.com

Finding a best pole saw is never an easy job. Read our reviews before opting for a pole saw. we are a dedicated website for pole saw reviews and ratings.

Visit bestpolesaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestpolesaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 643 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestpolesaw.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.117

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bestpolesaw.com

643 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

styles.css

42 ms

bootstrap.css

57 ms

css

145 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Bestpolesaw.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) relates to the external source S.ytimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (73%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

402.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestpolesaw.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 726.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.6 kB

  • Original 109.3 kB
  • After minification 105.2 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.5 kB
  • After minification 50.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestpolesaw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 393.3 kB

  • Original 589.7 kB
  • After minification 570.0 kB
  • After compression 196.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.3 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 589.9 kB

  • Original 726.8 kB
  • After minification 646.0 kB
  • After compression 136.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestpolesaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 589.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (60%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestpolesaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.bestpolesaw.com

www.bestpolesaw.com

643 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

78 ms

styles.css

styles.css

42 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

57 ms

css

css

145 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

78 ms

style.css

style.css

114 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

75 ms

animations.css

animations.css

62 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

79 ms

select2.css

select2.css

83 ms

offcanvasmenu.css

offcanvasmenu.css

77 ms

nanoscroller.css

nanoscroller.css

95 ms

idangerous.swiper.css

idangerous.swiper.css

96 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

128 ms

thickbox.css

thickbox.css

98 ms

css-skin.css

css-skin.css

115 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

133 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

132 ms

js-skin.js

js-skin.js

130 ms

frontpage.css

frontpage.css

125 ms

content-shortcodes.css

content-shortcodes.css

129 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

289 ms

galleries-shortcodes.css

galleries-shortcodes.css

288 ms

box-shortcodes.css

box-shortcodes.css

288 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

288 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

286 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

301 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

290 ms

easing.js

easing.js

278 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

289 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

289 ms

jquery.nanoscroller.min.js

jquery.nanoscroller.min.js

289 ms

template.js

template.js

288 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

288 ms

pie-chart.js

pie-chart.js

289 ms

main.js

main.js

289 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

288 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

251 ms

galleries-shortcodes.js

galleries-shortcodes.js

248 ms

other-shortcodes.js

other-shortcodes.js

249 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

350 ms

Tuz70-OLm9g

Tuz70-OLm9g

512 ms

cropped-Logo.png

cropped-Logo.png

240 ms

WORX-WG309-300x162.jpg

WORX-WG309-300x162.jpg

238 ms

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-90x90.jpg

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-90x90.jpg

237 ms

Remington-RM1025SPS-90x90.jpg

Remington-RM1025SPS-90x90.jpg

236 ms

Remington-RM1025P-90x90.jpg

Remington-RM1025P-90x90.jpg

239 ms

BLACKDECKER-LPP120-1-90x90.jpg

BLACKDECKER-LPP120-1-90x90.jpg

250 ms

GreenWorks-20672-G-MAX-90x90.jpg

GreenWorks-20672-G-MAX-90x90.jpg

297 ms

WORX-WG309-90x90.jpg

WORX-WG309-90x90.jpg

296 ms

BLACKDECKER-LPP120B-90x90.jpg

BLACKDECKER-LPP120B-90x90.jpg

297 ms

OREGON-PS250-A6-90x90.jpg

OREGON-PS250-A6-90x90.jpg

297 ms

Trimmerplus-PS720-90x90.jpg

Trimmerplus-PS720-90x90.jpg

296 ms

Husqvarna-128LDX-1-90x90.jpg

Husqvarna-128LDX-1-90x90.jpg

295 ms

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-1-300x162.jpg

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-1-300x162.jpg

299 ms

Remington-RM1025SPS-300x162.jpg

Remington-RM1025SPS-300x162.jpg

300 ms

Remington-RM1025P-300x162.jpg

Remington-RM1025P-300x162.jpg

291 ms

BLACKDECKER-LPP120-1-300x162.jpg

BLACKDECKER-LPP120-1-300x162.jpg

291 ms

GreenWorks-20672-G-MAX-300x162.jpg

GreenWorks-20672-G-MAX-300x162.jpg

289 ms

BLACKDECKER-LPP120B-300x162.jpg

BLACKDECKER-LPP120B-300x162.jpg

288 ms

OREGON-PS250-A6-300x162.jpg

OREGON-PS250-A6-300x162.jpg

320 ms

Trimmerplus-PS720-300x162.jpg

Trimmerplus-PS720-300x162.jpg

320 ms

Husqvarna-128LDX-1-300x162.jpg

Husqvarna-128LDX-1-300x162.jpg

318 ms

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-150x150.jpg

Sun-Joe-SWJ800E-150x150.jpg

319 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

101 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

102 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

99 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

www-embed-player-vfl_GjYBW.css

www-embed-player-vfl_GjYBW.css

256 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

292 ms

base.js

base.js

713 ms

style-glass.png

style-glass.png

141 ms

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf

422 ms

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf

PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf

423 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

390 ms

id

id

356 ms

18dPrr_sFW_l72_sWfaUSoLlPmtZtS24wUpQt8GC2U0.js

18dPrr_sFW_l72_sWfaUSoLlPmtZtS24wUpQt8GC2U0.js

419 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

440 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

106 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

126 ms

Accessibility Review

bestpolesaw.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestpolesaw.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestpolesaw.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestpolesaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestpolesaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestpolesaw.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestpolesaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: