Tools & Wizards About Us
bestqualitycountertops.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

bestqualitycountertops.com

Kitchen Countertops | Omaha | Best Quality Countertops

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

94 ms

Resources Loaded

917 ms

Page Rendered

55 ms

bestqualitycountertops.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestqualitycountertops.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Quality Countertops best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestqualitycountertops.com

Best Quality Countertops in Omaha Nebraska is the top distrubutor of granite, Quartz, and Solid Surface countertops. We have a wide selection of kitchen and bathroom countertops to for your new kitche...

Visit bestqualitycountertops.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestqualitycountertops.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 972 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestqualitycountertops.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bestqualitycountertops.com

94 ms

minified.js

31 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bestqualitycountertops.com, 35% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (605 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271.2 kB (38%)

Content Size

718.4 kB

After Optimization

447.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Bestqualitycountertops.com main page is 718.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 336.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 243.3 kB

  • Original 336.7 kB
  • After minification 335.1 kB
  • After compression 93.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 243.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Best Quality Countertops needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.6 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (37%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Quality Countertops. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.bestqualitycountertops.com

www.bestqualitycountertops.com

94 ms

minified.js

minified.js

31 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

91 ms

main.9a8f299d.bundle.min.js

main.9a8f299d.bundle.min.js

106 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

90 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

91 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

89 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

92 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

104 ms

bf3424_7f19e598284545369fad31111eda3bce~mv2.png

bf3424_7f19e598284545369fad31111eda3bce~mv2.png

298 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

53 ms

bf3424_1d0b187d73254a6a89a42269d9e1edfa~mv2.jpg

bf3424_1d0b187d73254a6a89a42269d9e1edfa~mv2.jpg

317 ms

bf3424_4545c9cca4fe498f9aff6fe069b0b4a6~mv2_d_3458_2304_s_2.jpg

bf3424_4545c9cca4fe498f9aff6fe069b0b4a6~mv2_d_3458_2304_s_2.jpg

314 ms

bf3424_5be338c05ddf48bcb9932cb054388ecc~mv2_d_5400_3600_s_4_2.jpg

bf3424_5be338c05ddf48bcb9932cb054388ecc~mv2_d_5400_3600_s_4_2.jpg

515 ms

bf3424_b4ef0e931cc245fbb4a20bb456b80555~mv2_d_2800_1874_s_2.jpg

bf3424_b4ef0e931cc245fbb4a20bb456b80555~mv2_d_2800_1874_s_2.jpg

336 ms

bf3424_bf21ce685aec4d438d4bca3c8911d190~mv2.png

bf3424_bf21ce685aec4d438d4bca3c8911d190~mv2.png

278 ms

bf3424_c62c40624390447f958f4e21a60c02d9~mv2.png

bf3424_c62c40624390447f958f4e21a60c02d9~mv2.png

605 ms

bf3424_3115c41baf784584876f6fb3316830b1~mv2.png

bf3424_3115c41baf784584876f6fb3316830b1~mv2.png

521 ms

035244_d689ceddf4ed40e1b2122bab3a5e38fc~mv2.png

035244_d689ceddf4ed40e1b2122bab3a5e38fc~mv2.png

315 ms

035244_d8e2397534c24db1a7e7a10991d73ccc~mv2.png

035244_d8e2397534c24db1a7e7a10991d73ccc~mv2.png

318 ms

035244_e6828d11d0ef465a8c1b263e4c31d602~mv2.png

035244_e6828d11d0ef465a8c1b263e4c31d602~mv2.png

319 ms

035244_6d553d072d074906921789d726bc57ca~mv2.png

035244_6d553d072d074906921789d726bc57ca~mv2.png

321 ms

88 ms

120 ms

120 ms

119 ms

115 ms

116 ms

135 ms

134 ms

134 ms

134 ms

134 ms

133 ms

9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

9_7S_tWeGDh5Pq3u05RVkj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

7 ms

97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aWz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

5 ms

6530bac7-21ac-4e52-a014-dce6a8d937ab.woff

6530bac7-21ac-4e52-a014-dce6a8d937ab.woff

9 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

21 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

bestqualitycountertops.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

bestqualitycountertops.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestqualitycountertops.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestqualitycountertops.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestqualitycountertops.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestqualitycountertops.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Quality Countertops. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: