Tools & Wizards About Us
bestscantool.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

bestscantool.net

Best OBD2 Scanners, Best Code Readers & Scan Tools in 2023

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

936 ms

bestscantool.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Best Scan Tool content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestscantool.net

Are you looking for the best OBD2 scanner? Don't buy until read reviews. We Make Shopping Quick and Easy. Our Research Has Helped To Find The Best automotive diagnostic scanner

Visit bestscantool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestscantool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestscantool.net performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestscantool.net

48 ms

www.bestscantool.net

1512 ms

f88c03625df171bb6b05550b287855e5.css

18 ms

js

74 ms

js

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Bestscantool.net, 21% (7 requests) were made to Images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestscantool.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

793.8 kB

After Optimization

728.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Bestscantool.net main page is 793.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 710.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 63.4 kB

  • Original 83.6 kB
  • After minification 83.6 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 710.2 kB
  • After minification 707.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Scan Tool images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Scan Tool. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

bestscantool.net

bestscantool.net

48 ms

www.bestscantool.net

www.bestscantool.net

1512 ms

f88c03625df171bb6b05550b287855e5.css

f88c03625df171bb6b05550b287855e5.css

18 ms

js

js

74 ms

js

js

122 ms

71c032c53f63a6f629137071ea0af357.js

71c032c53f63a6f629137071ea0af357.js

46 ms

71aI3XEQO9L._AC_SX425_.jpg

71aI3XEQO9L._AC_SX425_.jpg

60 ms

81x0yZhWVtL._AC_SX425_.jpg

81x0yZhWVtL._AC_SX425_.jpg

63 ms

tam-san-Grating.webp

tam-san-Grating.webp

77 ms

best-OBD2-scanner-reviews.jpg

best-OBD2-scanner-reviews.jpg

30 ms

logoscan-copy.png

logoscan-copy.png

272 ms

Best-OBD2-Scanner-Reviews-1.jpg

Best-OBD2-Scanner-Reviews-1.jpg

55 ms

image.php

image.php

259 ms

image.php

image.php

259 ms

image.php

image.php

267 ms

image.php

image.php

122 ms

image.php

image.php

272 ms

image.php

image.php

257 ms

obd2-scanner-buying-guide.jpg

obd2-scanner-buying-guide.jpg

257 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-DIY.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-DIY.jpg

257 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-money.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-money.jpg

588 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-Bluetooth.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-Bluetooth.jpg

265 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-DIY-300x141.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-DIY-300x141.jpg

512 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-Bluetooth-300x141.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-Bluetooth-300x141.jpg

278 ms

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-money-300x141.jpg

Best-OBD2-scanner-for-money-300x141.jpg

275 ms

61g02j4eC2S._AC_SX425_.jpg

61g02j4eC2S._AC_SX425_.jpg

55 ms

812WY826WeL._AC_SX425_.jpg

812WY826WeL._AC_SX425_.jpg

57 ms

71EwNPdt3jL._AC_SX425_.jpg

71EwNPdt3jL._AC_SX425_.jpg

55 ms

71RQ96Zb9eL._AC_SX425_.jpg

71RQ96Zb9eL._AC_SX425_.jpg

54 ms

91mO-RbJulL._AC_SX425_.jpg

91mO-RbJulL._AC_SX425_.jpg

57 ms

81aAM%2Bl7LML._AC_SY550_.jpg

81aAM%2Bl7LML._AC_SY550_.jpg

57 ms

71Tdi0n54zL._AC_SX425_.jpg

71Tdi0n54zL._AC_SX425_.jpg

53 ms

81yPQmNnvBL._AC_SX425_.jpg

81yPQmNnvBL._AC_SX425_.jpg

53 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

21 ms

Accessibility Review

bestscantool.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bestscantool.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bestscantool.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestscantool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestscantool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestscantool.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Scan Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: