Access bestshocker.ru. Электрошокеры купить в Санкт-Петербурге | Магазин средств самообороны, цены

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.4 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,770 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

bestshocker.ru

469 ms

bestshocker.ru

1088 ms

core.css

317 ms

page_17e02ca21d564b5429644ee41f9d396e_v1.css

335 ms

template_3822c7ea70728cdc7e5fe508b39fe449_v1.css

742 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Bestshocker.ru, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Bitrix.info. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Bestshocker.ru.

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Bestshocker.ru main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 279.1 kB

Original 319.5 kB
After minification 256.6 kB
After compression 40.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 62.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 279.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestshocker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 106.4 kB

Original 578.7 kB
After minification 578.6 kB
After compression 472.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.4 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 50.2 kB

Original 145.9 kB
After minification 145.9 kB
After compression 95.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestshocker.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Now

102

After Optimization

The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestshocker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestshocker.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestshocker.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestshocker.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestshocker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Электрошокеры купить в Санкт-Петербурге | Магазин средств самообороны, цены

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

bestshocker.ru

bestshocker.ru

core.css

page_17e02ca21d564b5429644ee41f9d396e_v1.css

template_3822c7ea70728cdc7e5fe508b39fe449_v1.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

bestshocker.ru

bestshocker.ru

core.css

page_17e02ca21d564b5429644ee41f9d396e_v1.css

template_3822c7ea70728cdc7e5fe508b39fe449_v1.css

css

core.js

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_polyfill_customevent_v1.js

dexie.bitrix.bundle.js

core_ls.js

core_frame_cache.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

ajax.js

core_currency.js

template_8fc43ddf944cfc168285934283d18ca3_v1.js

jqueryui.js

callibri.js

icons_wish.png

d64bfdf8476e28ab7966fc5ad5500d99.gif

3e83ba498d8c1a0dd6332bfa8f756837.jpg

8418120ce2b788e1a7905547ea432749.jpg

cb927cf7452a9a82ca90d12da6eab539.jpg

433f50007a0a89883015411011870875.jpg

72c18d7e05ecea9b9275f1536eb92cc1.webp

9f86366db98ce41dae5df0184401264b.webp

73b097a29efe5c71838e49ddf7525639.webp

9a2517b305f6b2e7839774cea9deef6a.webp

7a9b07079bcab5325f8fe28f8c7d4d31.webp

a637aaaafe10ff75f86594b2ac4dc2dd.jpg

6b5beff830feb2e4e7dea2a9009dcdb5.jpg

1ef8eada6c572f60036183a0dad1faf0.jpg

ad0087edd9f1dfd1914743c75461f4c2.jpg

627231646f6e4610e07cc7e6ac2665cd.jpg

21828ba167576a919528c806165346ab.jpg

cd6ecce38d2990e30d0063ddf5375e3b.webp

5b35839b102dd481f9b4b572aed554e2.webp

5bc549688bd0b025e32ba20dc5101852.webp

d47e38d91ab1096df6ab63dddd72cca5.webp

9555205138a600b3e7b5fa19f4a211c5.webp

96870554df6b05151a20b5a3896c44e7.webp

9126d02758c359154fd4b7c08f7cd59a.webp

0b0bbdeda71bbaee95cddd74dc0d2740.webp