2.7 sec in total
162 ms
1.9 sec
642 ms
Click here to check amazing Best Smart Watches Compared content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestsmartwatchescompared.com
The top-selling smart watches today compared on features, price, phone compatibility & apps. In plain English!
Visit bestsmartwatchescompared.comWe analyzed Bestsmartwatchescompared.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
bestsmartwatchescompared.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
162 ms
246 ms
246 ms
27 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Bestsmartwatchescompared.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (991 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestsmartwatchescompared.com.
Page size can be reduced by 462.9 kB (35%)
1.3 MB
865.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Bestsmartwatchescompared.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 724.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Smart Watches Compared images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 208.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.5 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestsmartwatchescompared.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (46%)
71
38
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Smart Watches Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
bestsmartwatchescompared.com
162 ms
www.bestsmartwatchescompared.com
246 ms
RU9bEsIgDLxQaeyXx3EoDYIDoRKwcntTcKY_mdlHdpMFTKKiTVE25aju4MmEuiGDYQYuLSBPC7i2Zr-JldCULjnzyMhYRAz-6Qb5elfMbbaaTFvTVzTx7InYf1B1m7CgWfYk_PA7nrg3_cEcPU03cBWjptF_wSvs4qycz30qfSCniD1igaLXgLusjFc2tLqGcoo_.css
246 ms
css
27 ms
ZY1REkAwDEQvJDL0RDWi0qGlCeX2dPDlb_fNvlmDft0onZV5A8zsklWqZw5Vg2ubDQx8UA-Ze0eKXv7wHSeSJQbhnWBiN2oXD7QipIKSeaHSb_05qj9U5As.js
219 ms
FcjRDYAgDAXAhZTqSBofUlKKtmBwe-N93koGv6o6P5iFz9T2Oig7RavapoVSR9n0n3x32BuiYLjwAQuF9QM.js
498 ms
all.js
8 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
109 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgp1jHUz8lMzygBCWUVlqYWVeqlJeYlVyblV-gVJCZnI8uDGQA.js
144 ms
JYzRDkAwDAB_yJTE_yxsRdGuui3i7wWPd7lcD2elsDsdF9SUizOMZBiK06MuJLBlOFXNz5akoESfg5GWlkmaDtaKPH7Rr3MzQEjMKO9Jj_vrBrjUIU8YX3wA.js
142 ms
hc_facebook_api.php
482 ms
M9QvSUzKSS0oSi0u1s8CosLS1KJKvZTEkkSwRLFebmYeAA.js
275 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
button.png
42 ms
displays.htm
70 ms
BestSmartWatchesCompared-logo1-e1394828331328.png
371 ms
pebble-steel-e1404569407347.jpg
371 ms
4-and-a-half-stars-300x57.jpeg
370 ms
learn-more-button-shiny.png
348 ms
moto-360-best-buy-shot-241x300.jpeg
369 ms
3-and-a-half-stars-300x70.jpeg
370 ms
Samsung-Gear-2-Smart-Watch-Black-154x221.png
369 ms
Sony-Ericsson-SW2-for-Android-232x300.png
582 ms
3-stars-300x93.jpeg
489 ms
comparison-charts-cta-1024x241.png
799 ms
pebble.jpg
684 ms
pebble-black-150x150.jpg
523 ms
pebblesteel.jpg
523 ms
pebble-apps-280x300.png
715 ms
samsung-gear-2-live-announced1.jpeg
661 ms
Smartphone-Compatibility-by-BestSmartWatchesCompared-dot-com-520x245.png
610 ms
Samsung-Gear-S-profile-520x245.jpeg
656 ms
take-all-my-money-520x245.jpg
712 ms
more-details-button.jpg
735 ms
moto-360-best-buy-shot-241x300.jpeg
758 ms
ajax-loader.gif
785 ms
arrow-1-white-l.png
794 ms
arrow-1-white-r.png
794 ms
lock-icon.png
876 ms
opacity-10.png
805 ms
s-right-s1.png
806 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
991 ms
ca-pub-8221767244882164.js
298 ms
zrt_lookup.html
296 ms
show_ads_impl.js
299 ms
54050327be9432c50d0001f5.js
322 ms
451 ms
js
249 ms
xd_arbiter.php
59 ms
xd_arbiter.php
76 ms
ads
303 ms
osd.js
20 ms
ads
291 ms
tagjs
23 ms
58 ms
adsct
155 ms
Pug
105 ms
in.php
157 ms
cb
55 ms
pixel
20 ms
sd
9 ms
cb
15 ms
tap.php
21 ms
xd_arbiter.php
12 ms
ncm
36 ms
cb
5 ms
m_js_controller.js
44 ms
abg.js
60 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
32 ms
15389017539504015323
34 ms
favicon
73 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
28 ms
s
22 ms
x_button_blue2.png
4 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
6 ms
bestsmartwatchescompared.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
bestsmartwatchescompared.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bestsmartwatchescompared.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestsmartwatchescompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestsmartwatchescompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bestsmartwatchescompared.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Best Smart Watches Compared. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: