Tools & Wizards About Us
bestwineclub.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

bestwineclub.com

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

bestwineclub.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bestwineclub.com now to see the best up-to-date Bestwineclub content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bestwineclub.com

Check our top picks for the Best Wine Club Subscriptions and Memberships. Explore the perfect wine club by choosing through Types, Gifts, Reviews, Coupons

Visit bestwineclub.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestwineclub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestwineclub.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,580 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestwineclub.com

30 ms

bestwineclub.com

349 ms

842b2942b1e8d4738297.css

96 ms

01759c52312c9d0e265a.css

95 ms

274ea551da795e5bd32d.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Bestwineclub.com, 24% (16 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 15% (10 requests) were made to Bestwineclubcom.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Bestwineclubcom.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 887.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestwineclub.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 877.2 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB
  • After compression 1.4 MB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 877.2 kB or 38% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 676.6 kB
  • After minification 675.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestwineclub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 677.1 kB
  • After minification 677.1 kB
  • After compression 669.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 757 B

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 143.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestwineclub.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (65%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestwineclub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestwineclub.com

bestwineclub.com

30 ms

bestwineclub.com

bestwineclub.com

349 ms

842b2942b1e8d4738297.css

842b2942b1e8d4738297.css

96 ms

01759c52312c9d0e265a.css

01759c52312c9d0e265a.css

95 ms

274ea551da795e5bd32d.css

274ea551da795e5bd32d.css

96 ms

8a948f223eb86e0668ce.css

8a948f223eb86e0668ce.css

94 ms

1e07777f405410064e05.css

1e07777f405410064e05.css

186 ms

cf833f11cfa758bd9485.css

cf833f11cfa758bd9485.css

107 ms

05deb5091a39130de3da.css

05deb5091a39130de3da.css

109 ms

2e3942f5a0dcf7d4bd73.css

2e3942f5a0dcf7d4bd73.css

108 ms

d71dce9c32c8cba0852c.css

d71dce9c32c8cba0852c.css

299 ms

1efc3798c23fa048091f.css

1efc3798c23fa048091f.css

167 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

168 ms

5675.8450f1aa9392a90c94ce.js

5675.8450f1aa9392a90c94ce.js

167 ms

4045.619e11ce9e2fed1c1f88.js

4045.619e11ce9e2fed1c1f88.js

189 ms

1847.017031f404064f838f29.js

1847.017031f404064f838f29.js

193 ms

8046.c46dc99253f70b3cd297.js

8046.c46dc99253f70b3cd297.js

193 ms

2176.6be5d3fd22cdf95f961e.js

2176.6be5d3fd22cdf95f961e.js

193 ms

4427.944ade6a10cde6a1f7ee.js

4427.944ade6a10cde6a1f7ee.js

193 ms

7029.cd428dfcf540038f72c8.js

7029.cd428dfcf540038f72c8.js

195 ms

7164.8e2ab895180001a65bce.js

7164.8e2ab895180001a65bce.js

194 ms

6415.dadb5de8ab8f108760a8.js

6415.dadb5de8ab8f108760a8.js

196 ms

4194.d0cba077bf29cab03b35.js

4194.d0cba077bf29cab03b35.js

199 ms

1033.ff9a2d4ad69c9c9318b3.js

1033.ff9a2d4ad69c9c9318b3.js

198 ms

2895.d9ee576cbed5f086f6ec.js

2895.d9ee576cbed5f086f6ec.js

206 ms

1392.d6a812ac617272d5e5a9.js

1392.d6a812ac617272d5e5a9.js

208 ms

9279.22633171bfe697b29d5d.js

9279.22633171bfe697b29d5d.js

205 ms

6331.3bda4029da08f00c653c.js

6331.3bda4029da08f00c653c.js

211 ms

webpack-206e7df0c57e8bf4ff07.js

webpack-206e7df0c57e8bf4ff07.js

209 ms

framework-c0b2deff84bbdc4d1d88.js

framework-c0b2deff84bbdc4d1d88.js

217 ms

main-1291652842290f8fe68f.js

main-1291652842290f8fe68f.js

214 ms

_app-2aa45c4d49387ca16a93.js

_app-2aa45c4d49387ca16a93.js

214 ms

75fc9c18-2a20c2e7f10e4bdea475.js

75fc9c18-2a20c2e7f10e4bdea475.js

215 ms

29107295-a36037e5ea1af0472eba.js

29107295-a36037e5ea1af0472eba.js

257 ms

2518-b1cd9f249b2ee78365ce.js

2518-b1cd9f249b2ee78365ce.js

261 ms

%5Bpath%5D-2c4bfcc4d2f5a9ef16b5.js

%5Bpath%5D-2c4bfcc4d2f5a9ef16b5.js

1452 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

261 ms

580x0

580x0

182 ms

1920x0

1920x0

1393 ms

Firstleaf_b.png

Firstleaf_b.png

1267 ms

qng4scz6IBE

qng4scz6IBE

226 ms

soa5R6CLG8I

soa5R6CLG8I

343 ms

0Nwegokakss

0Nwegokakss

341 ms

cG_Rft9HW9Y

cG_Rft9HW9Y

340 ms

ti1cErNcl9w

ti1cErNcl9w

339 ms

pvYNeW6hOJk

pvYNeW6hOJk

337 ms

b1xmi4K6Rco

b1xmi4K6Rco

337 ms

oM4_Cw1n8F8

oM4_Cw1n8F8

1157 ms

6P32SngQVLw

6P32SngQVLw

1103 ms

winc_b.png

winc_b.png

1245 ms

Bright%20Cellars_b.png

Bright%20Cellars_b.png

1320 ms

Dry%20Farm%20Wines_b.png

Dry%20Farm%20Wines_b.png

1322 ms

Naked%20Wines_b.png

Naked%20Wines_b.png

1246 ms

Wine%20Insiders_b.png

Wine%20Insiders_b.png

1321 ms

WSJ%20Wine_b.png

WSJ%20Wine_b.png

1491 ms

Vinebox_b.png

Vinebox_b.png

1321 ms

Laithwaites_b.png

Laithwaites_b.png

1321 ms

Wine%20of%20the%20Month%20Club_b.png

Wine%20of%20the%20Month%20Club_b.png

1558 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

178 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

137 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

182 ms

base.js

base.js

251 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

58 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

113 ms

base.js

base.js

516 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

892 ms

embed.js

embed.js

248 ms

Accessibility Review

bestwineclub.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bestwineclub.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

bestwineclub.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestwineclub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bestwineclub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestwineclub.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bestwineclub. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: