Tools & Wizards About Us
bestwoodfloorsanding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

bestwoodfloorsanding.com

清润高温材料(中国)租赁有限公司

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

bestwoodfloorsanding.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Bestwoodfloorsanding content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bestwoodfloorsanding.com

这里是清润高温材料(中国)家具有限公司在清润高温材料内黄县黄页的介绍页，位于内黄县7号26楼，营业范围有厂房安全检测、房屋安全检测、幼儿园抗震检测，厂房验厂检测，工程竣工验收检测、培训机构安全检测、厂房承重检测、钢结构厂房检测、危房安全评估检测、房产证房屋安全检测。

Visit bestwoodfloorsanding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestwoodfloorsanding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestwoodfloorsanding.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

bestwoodfloorsanding.com

212 ms

css

14 ms

css

23 ms

bootstrap.css

167 ms

font-awesome.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Bestwoodfloorsanding.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (732 ms) relates to the external source Seal-austin.bbb.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestwoodfloorsanding.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 89.0 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestwoodfloorsanding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 127.8 kB

  • Original 187.6 kB
  • After minification 183.3 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 127.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 223.6 kB

  • Original 254.4 kB
  • After minification 206.0 kB
  • After compression 30.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestwoodfloorsanding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 223.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestwoodfloorsanding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestwoodfloorsanding.com

bestwoodfloorsanding.com

212 ms

css

css

14 ms

css

css

23 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

167 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

99 ms

animations.css

animations.css

70 ms

style.css

style.css

72 ms

custom.css

custom.css

71 ms

logo.png

logo.png

78 ms

portfolio-1.jpg

portfolio-1.jpg

191 ms

portfolio-2.jpg

portfolio-2.jpg

119 ms

portfolio-3.jpg

portfolio-3.jpg

157 ms

portfolio-4.jpg

portfolio-4.jpg

129 ms

portfolio-5.jpg

portfolio-5.jpg

153 ms

portfolio-6.jpg

portfolio-6.jpg

187 ms

portfolio-7.jpg

portfolio-7.jpg

195 ms

portfolio-8.jpg

portfolio-8.jpg

186 ms

portfolio-9.jpg

portfolio-9.jpg

216 ms

portfolio-10.jpg

portfolio-10.jpg

217 ms

portfolio-11.jpg

portfolio-11.jpg

254 ms

portfolio-12.jpg

portfolio-12.jpg

226 ms

testimonial-1.png

testimonial-1.png

226 ms

testimonial-2.png

testimonial-2.png

228 ms

black-seal-96-50-best-wood-floor-sanding-90065336.png

black-seal-96-50-best-wood-floor-sanding-90065336.png

732 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

228 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

225 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

235 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

234 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

235 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

262 ms

template.js

template.js

264 ms

custom.js

custom.js

263 ms

testimonial-3.png

testimonial-3.png

276 ms

client-4.png

client-4.png

275 ms

client-5.png

client-5.png

276 ms

animate.css

animate.css

312 ms

bg-image-1.jpg

bg-image-1.jpg

307 ms

bg-image-2.jpg

bg-image-2.jpg

289 ms

mem6YaGs126MiZpBA-UFUK0Xdcg.ttf

mem6YaGs126MiZpBA-UFUK0Xdcg.ttf

13 ms

memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKWiUNhlIqY.ttf

memnYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUKWiUNhlIqY.ttf

16 ms

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFW50e.ttf

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFW50e.ttf

13 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OXOhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OXOhs.ttf

15 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOXOhs.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOXOhs.ttf

14 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

61 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

14 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

54 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

53 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

102 ms

SEO Factors

bestwoodfloorsanding.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestwoodfloorsanding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bestwoodfloorsanding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestwoodfloorsanding.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestwoodfloorsanding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: