5.9 sec in total
1.1 sec
4 sec
832 ms
Visit betgol.com.br now to see the best up-to-date Betgol content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betgol.com.br
Lotodobicho é uma plataforma de apostas online para jogar no jogo do bicho. Agora você pode administrar suas apostas e monitorar os resultados de um único lugar e com os mais rigorosos padrões de segu...
Visit betgol.com.brWe analyzed Betgol.com.br page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
betgol.com.br performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
1146 ms
24 ms
160 ms
158 ms
660 ms
Our browser made a total of 197 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (191 requests) were addressed to the original Betgol.com.br, 2% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Betgol.com.br.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (55%)
2.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Betgol.com.br main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 262.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.6 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Betgol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betgol.com.br needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 184 (96%)
192
8
The browser has sent 192 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betgol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 171 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
betgol.com.br
1146 ms
css
24 ms
estilo.css
160 ms
bjqs.css
158 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
660 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
231 ms
estilo.css
231 ms
estilo2.css
237 ms
estilo3.css
237 ms
styleMenu.css
306 ms
WebResource.axd
382 ms
WebResource.axd
236 ms
ScriptResource.axd
233 ms
ScriptResource.axd
85 ms
funcoes.js
78 ms
ScriptResource.axd
155 ms
ScriptResource.axd
162 ms
ScriptResource.axd
252 ms
ScriptResource.axd
256 ms
ScriptResource.axd
258 ms
ScriptResource.axd
279 ms
ScriptResource.axd
324 ms
ScriptResource.axd
308 ms
ScriptResource.axd
318 ms
ScriptResource.axd
318 ms
ScriptResource.axd
321 ms
ScriptResource.axd
357 ms
ScriptResource.axd
385 ms
ScriptResource.axd
391 ms
ScriptResource.axd
389 ms
ScriptResource.axd
434 ms
ScriptResource.axd
462 ms
ScriptResource.axd
436 ms
ScriptResource.axd
470 ms
ScriptResource.axd
540 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
510 ms
ScriptResource.axd
511 ms
ScriptResource.axd
565 ms
ScriptResource.axd
562 ms
ScriptResource.axd
561 ms
ScriptResource.axd
586 ms
ScriptResource.axd
590 ms
ScriptResource.axd
687 ms
ScriptResource.axd
630 ms
ScriptResource.axd
564 ms
ScriptResource.axd
567 ms
ScriptResource.axd
520 ms
ScriptResource.axd
525 ms
ScriptResource.axd
558 ms
css
13 ms
ScriptResource.axd
498 ms
ScriptResource.axd
503 ms
ScriptResource.axd
521 ms
ScriptResource.axd
500 ms
ScriptResource.axd
514 ms
ScriptResource.axd
538 ms
ScriptResource.axd
516 ms
ScriptResource.axd
497 ms
ScriptResource.axd
578 ms
ScriptResource.axd
514 ms
ScriptResource.axd
529 ms
ScriptResource.axd
548 ms
ScriptResource.axd
517 ms
ScriptResource.axd
496 ms
ScriptResource.axd
522 ms
ScriptResource.axd
536 ms
ScriptResource.axd
510 ms
ScriptResource.axd
515 ms
ScriptResource.axd
495 ms
ScriptResource.axd
501 ms
ScriptResource.axd
516 ms
ScriptResource.axd
493 ms
ScriptResource.axd
511 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
471 ms
ScriptResource.axd
489 ms
ScriptResource.axd
501 ms
ScriptResource.axd
492 ms
ScriptResource.axd
509 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
478 ms
ScriptResource.axd
489 ms
ScriptResource.axd
484 ms
ScriptResource.axd
486 ms
ScriptResource.axd
484 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
489 ms
ScriptResource.axd
485 ms
ScriptResource.axd
486 ms
ScriptResource.axd
500 ms
ScriptResource.axd
477 ms
ScriptResource.axd
483 ms
ScriptResource.axd
490 ms
ScriptResource.axd
478 ms
ScriptResource.axd
469 ms
ScriptResource.axd
480 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
467 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
472 ms
ScriptResource.axd
472 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
469 ms
ScriptResource.axd
479 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
478 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
472 ms
ScriptResource.axd
557 ms
ScriptResource.axd
468 ms
ScriptResource.axd
478 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
475 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
476 ms
ScriptResource.axd
497 ms
ScriptResource.axd
535 ms
ScriptResource.axd
473 ms
ScriptResource.axd
487 ms
ScriptResource.axd
492 ms
ScriptResource.axd
482 ms
ScriptResource.axd
525 ms
ScriptResource.axd
474 ms
ScriptResource.axd
494 ms
ScriptResource.axd
507 ms
ScriptResource.axd
499 ms
ScriptResource.axd
493 ms
ScriptResource.axd
513 ms
ScriptResource.axd
493 ms
ScriptResource.axd
494 ms
ScriptResource.axd
509 ms
ScriptResource.axd
501 ms
ScriptResource.axd
494 ms
ScriptResource.axd
513 ms
ScriptResource.axd
496 ms
ScriptResource.axd
495 ms
ScriptResource.axd
547 ms
ScriptResource.axd
587 ms
ScriptResource.axd
494 ms
ScriptResource.axd
515 ms
ScriptResource.axd
495 ms
ScriptResource.axd
491 ms
ScriptResource.axd
537 ms
ScriptResource.axd
537 ms
ScriptResource.axd
517 ms
ScriptResource.axd
503 ms
ScriptResource.axd
498 ms
ScriptResource.axd
650 ms
ScriptResource.axd
517 ms
ScriptResource.axd
516 ms
ScriptResource.axd
513 ms
ScriptResource.axd
500 ms
ScriptResource.axd
496 ms
ScriptResource.axd
518 ms
ScriptResource.axd
515 ms
ScriptResource.axd
510 ms
ScriptResource.axd
511 ms
ScriptResource.axd
495 ms
ScriptResource.axd
520 ms
ScriptResource.axd
534 ms
ScriptResource.axd
516 ms
ScriptResource.axd
523 ms
ScriptResource.axd
513 ms
ScriptResource.axd
489 ms
ScriptResource.axd
522 ms
ScriptResource.axd
532 ms
ScriptResource.axd
514 ms
ScriptResource.axd
521 ms
ScriptResource.axd
511 ms
ScriptResource.axd
485 ms
logo.png
614 ms
01.png
868 ms
02.png
833 ms
03.png
569 ms
logo2.png
563 ms
WebResource.axd
106 ms
WebResource.axd
106 ms
WebResource.axd
106 ms
WebResource.axd
101 ms
97uahxiqZRoncBaCEI3aW7O3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
91 ms
oOeFwZNlrTefzLYmlVV1ULO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
92 ms
Xu_FYwbs8k0teWf0uC8JpevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
91 ms
Pru33qjShpZSmG3z6VYwnbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
85 ms
WebResource.axd
79 ms
WebResource.axd
80 ms
WebResource.axd
82 ms
betgol.com.br accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
betgol.com.br best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
betgol.com.br SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betgol.com.br can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Betgol.com.br main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betgol.com.br
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Betgol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: