2.3 sec in total
43 ms
1.7 sec
554 ms
Visit betinking.com now to see the best up-to-date Betinking content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betinking.com
Todays Betinking prediction, Betinking predict provides free football tips, Betinking, sure soccer predictions as one of the Football Prediction Sites.
Visit betinking.comWe analyzed Betinking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
betinking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.0 s
0/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.196
63/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
43 ms
490 ms
41 ms
94 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Betinking.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (625 ms) relates to the external source Google-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (79%)
2.4 MB
499.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Betinking.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Betinking images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 362.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 362.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betinking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (88%)
82
10
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betinking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
betinking.com
43 ms
betinking.com
490 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
41 ms
style.min.css
94 ms
eae.min.css
85 ms
v4-shims.min.css
56 ms
all.min.css
69 ms
vegas.min.css
54 ms
blogger.css
67 ms
style.css
118 ms
responsive.css
101 ms
dashicons.min.css
139 ms
thickbox.css
113 ms
font-awesome.min.css
113 ms
ekiticons.css
140 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
151 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
148 ms
animations.min.css
149 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
149 ms
frontend.min.css
173 ms
post-825.css
162 ms
widgetarea-editor.css
163 ms
global.css
162 ms
post-254.css
165 ms
widget-styles.css
180 ms
widget-styles-pro.css
218 ms
responsive.css
168 ms
css
41 ms
css
57 ms
jetpack.css
205 ms
jquery.js
214 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
212 ms
v4-shims.min.js
212 ms
js
110 ms
widgets.js
119 ms
eae.min.js
156 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
158 ms
masonry.min.js
157 ms
animated-main.min.js
157 ms
particles.min.js
158 ms
magnific.min.js
234 ms
vegas.min.js
233 ms
swiper.min.js
238 ms
e-202045.js
96 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
233 ms
tilt.jquery.min.js
215 ms
core.min.js
209 ms
widget.min.js
201 ms
tabs.min.js
201 ms
accordion.min.js
188 ms
owl.min.js
186 ms
lib.js
186 ms
main.js
171 ms
thickbox.js
156 ms
comment-reply.min.js
192 ms
frontend-script.js
192 ms
widget-scripts.js
195 ms
wp-embed.min.js
183 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
184 ms
position.min.js
178 ms
dialog.min.js
177 ms
waypoints.min.js
177 ms
swiper.min.js
180 ms
share-link.min.js
172 ms
frontend.min.js
168 ms
elementor.js
165 ms
widgetarea-editor.js
131 ms
BA4FE3F8-FB08-4936-B4AB-3C10AB3B6E3D.jpeg
55 ms
TelegaM-640x380.jpg
55 ms
telegram-logo-640x414.jpg
55 ms
13ca0aa89bddb922a6dce689633ec370.min.js
593 ms
analytics.js
625 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
493 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
624 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
623 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
624 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
621 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
622 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
480 ms
sdk.js
589 ms
2611.svg
360 ms
sdk.js
377 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
280 ms
widget_iframe.96fd96193cc66c3e11d4c5e4c7c7ec97.html
141 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
156 ms
1f1f7-1f1f8.svg
218 ms
button.63c51c903061d0dbd843c41e8a00aa5a.js
73 ms
moment~timeline~tweet.ae149926685a43cb146e35371430188e.js
81 ms
timeline.687eed636a16648c9f0b1f72d7fa68bd.js
80 ms
collect
29 ms
sdk.js
29 ms
betinking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
betinking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
betinking.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betinking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betinking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betinking.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Betinking. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: