6.3 sec in total
343 ms
5.6 sec
395 ms
Visit betrachter.de now to see the best up-to-date Betrachter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betrachter.de
betrachter.de is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, betrachter.de has it all. We hope you find...
Visit betrachter.deWe analyzed Betrachter.de page load time and found that the first response time was 343 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
betrachter.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
343 ms
606 ms
187 ms
618 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Betrachter.de, 16% (11 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Betrachter.de.
Page size can be reduced by 300.2 kB (43%)
703.1 kB
402.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Betrachter.de main page is 703.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 390.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Betrachter needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 183.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 183.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betrachter.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (48%)
52
27
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Betrachter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
betrachter.de
343 ms
www.betrachter.de
606 ms
style.css
187 ms
prototype.js
618 ms
effects.js
286 ms
scriptaculous.js
189 ms
modalbox.js
284 ms
AJS.js
269 ms
AJS_fx.js
370 ms
gb_scripts.js
377 ms
maps
38 ms
gb_styles.css
452 ms
tw-sack.js
470 ms
postratings-js.js
471 ms
postratings-css.css
550 ms
pagenavi-css.css
637 ms
modalbox.css
638 ms
builder.js
185 ms
dragdrop.js
208 ms
controls.js
209 ms
slider.js
258 ms
sound.js
1260 ms
staticmap
38 ms
rating_over.gif
95 ms
foto.jpg
1648 ms
rating_off.gif
188 ms
loading.gif
192 ms
rating_on.gif
191 ms
icon_wink.gif
194 ms
entwickler.jpg
283 ms
schieb.jpg
368 ms
suedkurier.jpg
370 ms
pcgames.gif
372 ms
pcghw.gif
372 ms
wdrferns.gif
471 ms
wdr2.gif
552 ms
dradio.gif
555 ms
web.gif
558 ms
generalanzeiger.gif
556 ms
consumerblog.gif
654 ms
nordclick.gif
741 ms
gmx.gif
739 ms
express.gif
741 ms
pcpraxis.gif
743 ms
wz.gif
840 ms
arcor.gif
924 ms
digiklix.gif
925 ms
kwick.jpg
926 ms
computerbild.gif
927 ms
staticmap
36 ms
staticmap
34 ms
staticmap
68 ms
staticmap
34 ms
staticmap
34 ms
staticmap
35 ms
staticmap
35 ms
staticmap
56 ms
staticmap
36 ms
poststovote.php
1016 ms
topsenders.php
1165 ms
snapshot_1208536118.gif
367 ms
zwiebelmett_1199290483.gif
96 ms
dragon_1249503625.jpg
936 ms
kr%C3%BCmel_1260198515.jpg
1347 ms
resch_1196958266.JPG
974 ms
w_close.gif
185 ms
header_bg.gif
186 ms
g_close.gif
188 ms
indicator.gif
281 ms
betrachter.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
betrachter.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
betrachter.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betrachter.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Betrachter.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betrachter.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Betrachter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: