Tools & Wizards About Us
betterimage.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 79% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

betterimage.org

Better Image | Web Design & Local SEO in Cary NC

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

644 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

betterimage.org screenshot

About Website

Visit betterimage.org now to see the best up-to-date Better Image content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betterimage.org

Website Design, Internet Marketing & Local Search Engine Optimization(SEO), WordPress Development for Small Businesses in Cary NC and Raleigh area. Optimized Websites at a Most Reasonable Price.

Visit betterimage.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Betterimage.org page load time and found that the first response time was 644 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

betterimage.org performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.betterimage.org

644 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

88 ms

style.min.css

224 ms

styles.css

233 ms

css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Betterimage.org, 20% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (914 ms) relates to the external source C.statcounter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Betterimage.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 69.4 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Better Image images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 164.7 kB
  • After minification 164.7 kB
  • After compression 135.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 131.3 kB
  • After compression 121.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betterimage.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Image. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.betterimage.org

www.betterimage.org

644 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

88 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

224 ms

styles.css

styles.css

233 ms

css

css

96 ms

style.css

style.css

457 ms

style-custom.css

style-custom.css

276 ms

style.css

style.css

219 ms

uncode-gutenberg-frontend.css

uncode-gutenberg-frontend.css

217 ms

uncode-icons.css

uncode-icons.css

326 ms

init.min.js

init.min.js

349 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

384 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

269 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

343 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

342 ms

index.js

index.js

368 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

807 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

375 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

376 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

888 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

827 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

432 ms

tccl.min.js

tccl.min.js

70 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

74 ms

Better-Image-Dark-1.png

Better-Image-Dark-1.png

406 ms

Better-Image-Light-1.png

Better-Image-Light-1.png

105 ms

market-imports2020.jpg

market-imports2020.jpg

848 ms

wdmore.jpg

wdmore.jpg

808 ms

Arbormax.jpg

Arbormax.jpg

855 ms

Raleigh-Premium-Cabinets.jpg

Raleigh-Premium-Cabinets.jpg

831 ms

better-image.png

better-image.png

831 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

767 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

797 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

801 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

816 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

809 ms

better-image-work-1.jpg

better-image-work-1.jpg

856 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

741 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

742 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

754 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

752 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

754 ms

Raleigh-North-Carolina-Web-Design.jpg

Raleigh-North-Carolina-Web-Design.jpg

419 ms

uncode-icons.woff

uncode-icons.woff

247 ms

macbook-air-work.jpg

macbook-air-work.jpg

242 ms

ga.js

ga.js

90 ms

counter.js

counter.js

178 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

759 ms

t.php

t.php

914 ms

Accessibility Review

betterimage.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

betterimage.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

betterimage.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterimage.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betterimage.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

betterimage.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Image. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: