Tools & Wizards About Us
betterpayment.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

betterpayment.de

Better Payment - Payment & White Label provider for payment processing

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

888 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

531 ms

betterpayment.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Better Payment content for Thailand. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about betterpayment.de

As a payment provider, we offer white label solutions in addition to classic online payment processing, as well as risk and receivables management.

Visit betterpayment.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Betterpayment.de page load time and found that the first response time was 888 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

betterpayment.de performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

888 ms

style.min.css

44 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

48 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

49 ms

front.min.css

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Betterpayment.de, 13% (6 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (929 ms) belongs to the original domain Betterpayment.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.4 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

953.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Betterpayment.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 579.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 54.5 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 119.0 kB

  • Original 579.4 kB
  • After minification 460.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Better Payment needs image optimization as it can save up to 119.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 386.0 kB
  • After minification 386.0 kB
  • After compression 369.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 140.1 kB
  • After minification 140.1 kB
  • After compression 110.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betterpayment.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (84%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Payment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

888 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

44 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

48 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

49 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

103 ms

style.css

style.css

205 ms

font.css

font.css

308 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

310 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

312 ms

style.css

style.css

315 ms

aos.css

aos.css

315 ms

jarallax.css

jarallax.css

308 ms

slick.css

slick.css

408 ms

page.min.css

page.min.css

714 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

417 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

46 ms

custom.js

custom.js

415 ms

js

js

137 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

416 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

415 ms

objectFitPolyfill.min.js

objectFitPolyfill.min.js

509 ms

aos.js

aos.js

517 ms

jquery.countdown.min.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

517 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

518 ms

countUp.min.js

countUp.min.js

518 ms

granim.min.js

granim.min.js

610 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

619 ms

typed.min.js

typed.min.js

619 ms

lity.min.js

lity.min.js

620 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

43 ms

shuffle.min.js

shuffle.min.js

620 ms

jarallax.min.js

jarallax.min.js

928 ms

jarallax-video.min.js

jarallax-video.min.js

928 ms

page.min.js

page.min.js

929 ms

e-202433.js

e-202433.js

44 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

157 ms

Better_Payment-v1-a-e1587713111729.png

Better_Payment-v1-a-e1587713111729.png

244 ms

Better_Payment-v4-a-e1587712974120.png

Better_Payment-v4-a-e1587712974120.png

313 ms

BP_Dashboard_home-e1582886143936.png

BP_Dashboard_home-e1582886143936.png

436 ms

BP-Services-Paas.png

BP-Services-Paas.png

511 ms

et-line.woff

et-line.woff

305 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

252 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

44 ms

api.js

api.js

63 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

23 ms

Accessibility Review

betterpayment.de accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

betterpayment.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

betterpayment.de SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterpayment.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betterpayment.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

betterpayment.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Better Payment. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: