4.6 sec in total
216 ms
4.2 sec
146 ms
Welcome to betterplanning.net homepage info - get ready to check Better Planning best content right away, or after learning these important things about betterplanning.net
Visit betterplanning.netWe analyzed Betterplanning.net page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
betterplanning.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value870 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
216 ms
3218 ms
66 ms
93 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Betterplanning.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Betterplanning.net.
Page size can be reduced by 489.9 kB (59%)
828.1 kB
338.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Betterplanning.net main page is 828.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 389.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Better Planning needs image optimization as it can save up to 165.7 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 173.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Betterplanning.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 129.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (66%)
65
22
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Planning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
betterplanning.net
216 ms
3218 ms
styles.css
66 ms
social_widget.css
93 ms
jquery.js
128 ms
widgetkit-12af3e92.css
110 ms
widgetkit-c490ea5f.js
112 ms
base.css
110 ms
layout.css
117 ms
menus.css
148 ms
modules.css
179 ms
tools.css
182 ms
system.css
180 ms
extensions.css
165 ms
custom.css
179 ms
dark_squares.css
180 ms
trebuchet.css
212 ms
patuaone.css
224 ms
trebuchet.css
223 ms
style.css
230 ms
responsive.css
217 ms
print.css
227 ms
patuaone.css
260 ms
warp.js
257 ms
responsive.js
274 ms
accordionmenu.js
269 ms
dropdownmenu.js
276 ms
template.js
283 ms
search.js
295 ms
jquery.form.min.js
309 ms
scripts.js
325 ms
lightbox.js
206 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
265 ms
spotlight.js
212 ms
base.css
207 ms
layout.css
216 ms
menus.css
237 ms
modules.css
217 ms
system.css
208 ms
system.css
225 ms
system-all.css
235 ms
tools.css
250 ms
responsive.css
216 ms
print.css
210 ms
dark_squares_bg.jpg
81 ms
logo.png
133 ms
menu_line_item.png
83 ms
facebook.png
80 ms
twitter.png
83 ms
linkedin.png
81 ms
rss.png
93 ms
email.png
110 ms
menubar_bg.png
113 ms
searchbox_magnifier.png
105 ms
CyberCash.png
250 ms
school-life.png
138 ms
smsgateway.png
145 ms
smspro.png
203 ms
global-Bank-logo.png
211 ms
hr.png
297 ms
Global-Accounting.jpg
189 ms
CamerHost.jpg
184 ms
module_badges.png
214 ms
list_check.png
217 ms
totop_scroller.png
243 ms
slideset.js
220 ms
menu_dropdown_level3.png
201 ms
patuaone-regular-webfont.woff
223 ms
betterplanning.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
betterplanning.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
betterplanning.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterplanning.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Betterplanning.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betterplanning.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Planning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: