Tools & Wizards About Us
bettersolar.aw screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

bettersolar.aw

Better Solar Aruba | Solar System Green Energy Aruba | Paradera

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

63 ms

bettersolar.aw screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Better Solar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bettersolar.aw

Better Solar Aruba: Free energy for Aruba. High quality solar solutions for a better price. We can implement a complete solar panel solution for your home or business but we can also provide you with ...

Visit bettersolar.aw

Key Findings

We analyzed Bettersolar.aw page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bettersolar.aw performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bettersolar.aw

103 ms

minified.js

25 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

63 ms

polyfill.min.js

283 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bettersolar.aw, 38% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (620 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 427.6 kB (53%)

Content Size

811.3 kB

After Optimization

383.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Bettersolar.aw main page is 811.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 371.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 255.0 kB

  • Original 339.5 kB
  • After minification 337.8 kB
  • After compression 84.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 255.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Better Solar needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 153.7 kB

  • Original 371.5 kB
  • After minification 371.5 kB
  • After compression 217.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 153.7 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Solar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.bettersolar.aw

www.bettersolar.aw

103 ms

minified.js

minified.js

25 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

63 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

283 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1e70fbb2.bundle.min.js

59 ms

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

main.42e492e1.bundle.min.js

61 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

65 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

64 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

64 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

65 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

60 ms

88be77_69ed9778024f43de8696e02152480251~mv2_d_4711_3141_s_4_2.jpg

88be77_69ed9778024f43de8696e02152480251~mv2_d_4711_3141_s_4_2.jpg

306 ms

Better%20solar_white-01.png

Better%20solar_white-01.png

565 ms

c19c76_376dc1d20bd348b99c4a732a1d6d7c81.png

c19c76_376dc1d20bd348b99c4a732a1d6d7c81.png

310 ms

88be77_59d303ba29d349a9b3fe635b8a1b661a~mv2.png

88be77_59d303ba29d349a9b3fe635b8a1b661a~mv2.png

590 ms

Assesment.jpg

Assesment.jpg

602 ms

dak%20installatie.jpg

dak%20installatie.jpg

620 ms

customer%20care.jpg

customer%20care.jpg

485 ms

88be77_e6922b40fe324360ad97361d4e0d7379~mv2.jpg

88be77_e6922b40fe324360ad97361d4e0d7379~mv2.jpg

562 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

53 ms

110 ms

104 ms

105 ms

101 ms

101 ms

95 ms

138 ms

134 ms

131 ms

133 ms

132 ms

132 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

18 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

1 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

10 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

6 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

bettersolar.aw accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

bettersolar.aw best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bettersolar.aw SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bettersolar.aw can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Bettersolar.aw main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bettersolar.aw

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Better Solar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: