Tools & Wizards About Us
bettertechnology.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

bettertechnology.co.uk

Better Technology Consulting - Bespoke Software Development

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

455 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

883 ms

bettertechnology.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit bettertechnology.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Better Technology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bettertechnology.co.uk

We are a UK-based technology consulting & software development company, specialising in web applications, spreadsheets and databases.

Visit bettertechnology.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Bettertechnology.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 455 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bettertechnology.co.uk performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,590 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bettertechnology.co.uk

455 ms

gtm.js

109 ms

css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

575 ms

icofont.min.css

504 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Bettertechnology.co.uk, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Bettertechnology.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

959.5 kB

After Optimization

854.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bettertechnology.co.uk main page is 959.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 422.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 35.7 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 422.1 kB
  • After minification 397.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Better Technology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 405.8 kB
  • After minification 405.8 kB
  • After compression 387.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 76.5 kB
  • After minification 76.5 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bettertechnology.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bettertechnology.co.uk

bettertechnology.co.uk

455 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

109 ms

css

css

38 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

575 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

504 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

523 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

526 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

359 ms

style.css

style.css

442 ms

api.js

api.js

43 ms

logo.png

logo.png

697 ms

portfolio-1.jpg

portfolio-1.jpg

869 ms

embed

embed

194 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1050 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

1254 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

672 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

937 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

1069 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

1030 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1277 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1340 ms

validate.js

validate.js

1354 ms

main.js

main.js

1371 ms

portfolio-2.jpg

portfolio-2.jpg

1683 ms

portfolio-3.jpg

portfolio-3.jpg

3367 ms

portfolio-4.jpg

portfolio-4.jpg

1609 ms

portfolio-5.jpg

portfolio-5.jpg

2663 ms

portfolio-6.jpg

portfolio-6.jpg

1770 ms

testimonial-0.png

testimonial-0.png

2002 ms

testimonial-1.jpg

testimonial-1.jpg

1935 ms

testimonial-2.png

testimonial-2.png

2103 ms

testimonial-3.jpg

testimonial-3.jpg

2103 ms

testimonial-4.png

testimonial-4.png

2266 ms

testimonial-5.jpg

testimonial-5.jpg

2337 ms

logo-transparent.png

logo-transparent.png

2704 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

23 ms

js

js

64 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

19 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

5 ms

js

js

124 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

2369 ms

search.js

search.js

6 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

9 ms

main.js

main.js

16 ms

counter-bg.jpg

counter-bg.jpg

2262 ms

font

font

23 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

2622 ms

font

font

31 ms

boxicons.woff

boxicons.woff

2753 ms

Accessibility Review

bettertechnology.co.uk accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

bettertechnology.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bettertechnology.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bettertechnology.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bettertechnology.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bettertechnology.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Technology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: