19.4 sec in total
497 ms
17.4 sec
1.5 sec
Visit betterweb.ae now to see the best up-to-date Better Web content for United Arab Emirates and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about betterweb.ae
Looking for a website design in Dubai? BetterWeb is an expert in the field of website design in United Arab Emirates.
Visit betterweb.aeWe analyzed Betterweb.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 18.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
betterweb.ae performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
497 ms
781 ms
1659 ms
629 ms
287 ms
Our browser made a total of 148 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Betterweb.ae, 24% (36 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (10 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Betterweb.ae.
Page size can be reduced by 93.8 kB (5%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Betterweb.ae main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Better Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (24%)
132
100
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
betterweb.ae
497 ms
betterweb.ae
781 ms
serve
1659 ms
serve
629 ms
conversion.js
287 ms
js
1415 ms
cbh.js
2619 ms
serve
5069 ms
analytics.js
842 ms
watch.js
11 ms
logo-x2.png
161 ms
57042b4ae2cc0.jpg
7580 ms
57042c1e874c5.jpg
1436 ms
57042ad94f7d5.jpg
1656 ms
56e94d9122edd.jpg
6509 ms
292 ms
fbds.js
1161 ms
watch.js
21 ms
top_bg.jpg
974 ms
town.png
14344 ms
clouds.png
1498 ms
birds.png
2415 ms
trees.png
1785 ms
heli.png
2412 ms
5702882b51cc3.png
2527 ms
57042c1e875a5.png
2542 ms
57042ad94f8af.png
2903 ms
56ee87c8568e1.png
2647 ms
services-parallax.jpg
4553 ms
contact-form-bg.png
3132 ms
hatori-2.woff
4018 ms
fontawesome-webfont78ce.woff
6155 ms
default
616 ms
piwik.js
4595 ms
common.js
1121 ms
map.js
726 ms
util.js
632 ms
marker.js
487 ms
254 ms
icons.png
320 ms
1460146410240
616 ms
collect
108 ms
collect
236 ms
936 ms
onion.js
165 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
1106 ms
ajax-loader-3.gif
353 ms
1521 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
302 ms
stats.js
186 ms
controls.js
361 ms
spotlight-poi.png
956 ms
vt
595 ms
vt
594 ms
vt
594 ms
vt
259 ms
vt
592 ms
vt
597 ms
vt
597 ms
vt
653 ms
vt
782 ms
vt
653 ms
vt
650 ms
vt
651 ms
vt
650 ms
vt
722 ms
vt
717 ms
vt
691 ms
vt
710 ms
vt
705 ms
vt
741 ms
vt
741 ms
vt
739 ms
vt
796 ms
vt
788 ms
vt
769 ms
vt
788 ms
transparent.png
1061 ms
css
813 ms
google4.png
167 ms
mapcnt6.png
199 ms
sv5.png
224 ms
tmapctrl.png
166 ms
cb_scout5.png
196 ms
tmapctrl4.png
214 ms
imgs8.png
221 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
256 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
261 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
265 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
364 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1108 ms
165 ms
130 ms
v3
851 ms
1083 ms
ui.totop.png
1061 ms
56decfd467904.jpg
2635 ms
56ee87d68c4d9.png
1190 ms
56dedc26b6034.png
1340 ms
56df0cf820f81.png
1504 ms
56df174d005cc.jpg
1617 ms
56dec66eaf1c2.png
2197 ms
56dedd803ad55.png
2332 ms
56df148563e38.png
3704 ms
56df17c45585a.png
2468 ms
56ee8912b87d1.png
2606 ms
56dfe96d22a48.png
2647 ms
56df13c13db59.jpg
2726 ms
56decd3f1a08e.png
2747 ms
56ded9ec1c714.png
2764 ms
56f55a5e76668.png
2842 ms
56df1f0db113d.jpg
3154 ms
56e94c41d6653.jpg
2881 ms
56ded4b985fc3.jpg
3135 ms
56ded8a621f9c.png
3450 ms
56deca4f7fb6b.png
3258 ms
56dece378c605.png
3443 ms
56df18d1d6e6e.png
3419 ms
56ded5e5c9c2c.png
3562 ms
mysql.png
3706 ms
cakephp.png
3563 ms
ajax.png
4205 ms
joomla.png
3832 ms
woocommerce.png
3704 ms
infobip.png
3668 ms
opencart.png
3249 ms
propspace.png
3408 ms
mssql.png
3157 ms
prestashop.png
2782 ms
digitalocean.png
2637 ms
codeigniter.jpg
2731 ms
masterkey.png
2625 ms
css3.png
2049 ms
mariadb.png
2057 ms
angularjs.png
2156 ms
magento.png
1905 ms
nodejs.png
1999 ms
html5.png
1775 ms
mongodb.png
2007 ms
yii.png
1850 ms
paypal.png
1781 ms
payfort.png
1892 ms
apache.png
1893 ms
javascript.png
1977 ms
wordpress.png
1793 ms
nginx.png
1640 ms
php.png
2833 ms
QuotaService.RecordEvent
326 ms
betterweb.ae accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
betterweb.ae best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
betterweb.ae SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Betterweb.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Betterweb.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
betterweb.ae
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Better Web. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: