Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

bfttr.net

大发全天时时计划

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

491 ms

bfttr.net screenshot

About Website

Visit bfttr.net now to see the best up-to-date Bfttr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bfttr.net

保利发展是中国保利集团控股的大型中央企业,福布斯世界500强 ,致力于打造“不动产生态发展平台”,以扎实的不动产投资、开发、运营、资本运作能力为基础,提供基于行业生态系统的综合服务,与客户美好生活同行。

Visit bfttr.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bfttr.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bfttr.net performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.bfttr.net

1075 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

423 ms

style.css

440 ms

responsive.css

295 ms

font-awesome.css

447 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Bfttr.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Bookmark.web.tr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 213.5 kB (42%)

Content Size

506.6 kB

After Optimization

293.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Bfttr.net main page is 506.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 219.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 48.9 kB

  • Original 59.3 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 154.4 kB
  • After minification 144.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bfttr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 219.5 kB
  • After minification 218.2 kB
  • After compression 123.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 58.7 kB

  • Original 73.4 kB
  • After minification 71.2 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bfttr.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (57%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bfttr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bfttr.net accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

bfttr.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

bfttr.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bfttr.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Turkish language. Our system also found out that Bfttr.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bfttr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: