Tools & Wizards About Us
bi-packaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bi-packaging.com

Cosmetics & Perfume Packaging Solution Manufacturer | B.I. Packaging

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

373 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

bi-packaging.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bi-packaging.com homepage info - get ready to check B I Packaging best content for United Arab Emirates right away, or after learning these important things about bi-packaging.com

BI-PACKAGINIG, leading packaging manufacturer within 20 years' experience! We specialize in perfume and cosmetic packaging solution in various styles & sizes with different materials accoring to vario...

Visit bi-packaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bi-packaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bi-packaging.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.223

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bi-packaging.com

373 ms

bi-packaging.com

290 ms

www.bi-packaging.com

710 ms

index.min.css

209 ms

en.png

212 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bi-packaging.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Bi-packaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.3 kB (48%)

Content Size

423.7 kB

After Optimization

219.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bi-packaging.com main page is 423.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 195.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 173.3 kB

  • Original 195.2 kB
  • After minification 108.2 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 87.1 kB, which is 45% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 106.6 kB
  • After minification 92.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, B I Packaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 96.0 kB
  • After minification 96.0 kB
  • After compression 79.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 705 B

  • Original 25.8 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bi-packaging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (51%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of B I Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bi-packaging.com

bi-packaging.com

373 ms

bi-packaging.com

bi-packaging.com

290 ms

www.bi-packaging.com

www.bi-packaging.com

710 ms

index.min.css

index.min.css

209 ms

en.png

en.png

212 ms

ja.png

ja.png

212 ms

ko.png

ko.png

213 ms

fr.png

fr.png

212 ms

de.png

de.png

266 ms

es.png

es.png

412 ms

it.png

it.png

415 ms

ru.png

ru.png

416 ms

pt.png

pt.png

418 ms

ar.png

ar.png

420 ms

nl.png

nl.png

467 ms

b.i.-packaging-logo.webp

b.i.-packaging-logo.webp

615 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

622 ms

sea.js

sea.js

558 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

631 ms

kaka-1.0.0.js

kaka-1.0.0.js

567 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

608 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

756 ms

traffic.js

traffic.js

767 ms

new-banner.webp

new-banner.webp

982 ms

bipackaging-one-step-cosmetic-and-perfume-packaging-solution.webp

bipackaging-one-step-cosmetic-and-perfume-packaging-solution.webp

954 ms

cosmetic-packaging1.webp

cosmetic-packaging1.webp

900 ms

perfume-packaging1.webp

perfume-packaging1.webp

907 ms

gb-858-100ml.webp

gb-858-100ml.webp

1033 ms

gb-855-100ml.webp

gb-855-100ml.webp

1046 ms

gb-851-100ml.webp

gb-851-100ml.webp

1179 ms

gb-845-100ml.webp

gb-845-100ml.webp

1176 ms

aromas-unleashed-creative-perfume-bottle-designs-for-niche-fragrances.webp

aromas-unleashed-creative-perfume-bottle-designs-for-niche-fragrances.webp

1303 ms

whiff-of-luxury-decoding-high-end-fragrance-bottle-packaging.webp

whiff-of-luxury-decoding-high-end-fragrance-bottle-packaging.webp

1330 ms

eco-chic-beauty-the-rise-of-sustainable-aluminum-cosmetic-packaging.webp

eco-chic-beauty-the-rise-of-sustainable-aluminum-cosmetic-packaging.webp

1310 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1119 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1247 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1258 ms

waves-shape.png

waves-shape.png

271 ms

about-bg.jpg

about-bg.jpg

333 ms

gilroy-regular.otf

gilroy-regular.otf

273 ms

gilroy-bold.otf

gilroy-bold.otf

282 ms

iconfont.woff

iconfont.woff

211 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

351 ms

kaka.validator.js

kaka.validator.js

331 ms

Accessibility Review

bi-packaging.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bi-packaging.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bi-packaging.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bi-packaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bi-packaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bi-packaging.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of B I Packaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: